A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#2i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead.
anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems with?
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#3give me this for mac os please. my home-rolled dotfiles repo is ok, but id really love some config management system that’s not ansible that i could use to bootstrap my workstations. i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead. anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems wi…
I’ve thought about using it to set up my machines/machines at work but haven’t gone down that road yet.
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#4give me this for mac os please. my home-rolled dotfiles repo is ok, but id really love some config management system that’s not ansible that i could use to bootstrap my workstations. i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead. anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems wi…
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#5Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#6give me this for mac os please. my home-rolled dotfiles repo is ok, but id really love some config management system that’s not ansible that i could use to bootstrap my workstations. i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead. anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems wi…
What's wrong with ansible?
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#7give me this for mac os please. my home-rolled dotfiles repo is ok, but id really love some config management system that’s not ansible that i could use to bootstrap my workstations. i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead. anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems wi…
Here's the wrapper script:
ansible-playbook -i localhost, --connection=local playbook.yml "$@"
You run the script with "-CD" for dry run mode, and without arguments for production mode. And here's the docs for the available modules [0].[0] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/collections/ansible/...
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#8I feel like we will eventually recognize a variant of Greenspun's Tenth Rule as common wisdom:
> Any sufficiently complicated build system or configuration management system contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Nix.
(Although to be honest it might make more sense to replace "Nix" with "Guix"...)
Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#9Re: A configuration management system for computers that are pets, not cattle
#10give me this for mac os please. my home-rolled dotfiles repo is ok, but id really love some config management system that’s not ansible that i could use to bootstrap my workstations. i used to write a lot of chef and generally like ruby, but i can’t make heads or tails of whatever progress chef is. mostly seems like chef as an oss tool is dead. anybody got something else they like to configure their mac os systems wi…