I've read that doctors now spend as much as 50% of their time documenting their work. Companies such as Epic, which provide the software that hospitals use to build databases of patient data, have been big winners in the new world of hospitals-depending-on-software. But did the doctors become more productive? By almost any measure, they became less productive. People in tech keep thinking more tech will solve problem…
U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
351–360 of 751 posts
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems an artefact of doctors not being employees. If their employment status was the same as everyone else’s, there wouldn’t be any effort to replace admin staff with someone getting paid 10x as much unless there was actually a 90% reduction in work (doubtful).
You can reduce 90% of the work - but if the remaining 10% is shifted to someone that gets paid 50x as much, it's still a loss.
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also because it's enterprise software. Which actually isn't software, it's more of a platform. You have to do so much implementation detail that the GUI is just the result of some form-builder type module. Everything I've ever encountered that was enterprise software, felt like it's GUI was not made by humans at all. I don't actually know how they get built but they're almost never optimized for humans or the us…
Nobody wants to pay for better GUIs in enterprise software, so no vendor puts any attention into them. An Enterprise Architect explicitly explained to me (when I was raising a point of choosing a software package that had much better UI) that good UX is a small factor and company (a bank in that case) would rather buy cheaper software and just have its workers suffer more, because it's deemed more cost-effective.
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It was to have a record that is standard, digital, transferable, etc. Which translates into productivity. If something is standard, digital and transferable it means you can increase the rate of output in relation to its input (which is the definition of productivity).
Right, but it's the records that are standard, digital and transferrable; not the work. So what you end up optimizing for is producing paperwork.
Is there a "standard" medical record, or does each system implement its own proprietary format? Are the records transferrable? If so, why am I asked to fill out a complete medical history form on paper every time I visit the a doctor, as if I'm a new patient, when all the doctors I see are in the same network and presumably use the same EHR system.
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
> towards something in which everything was codified, safetyism became rampant Those "gentleman's agreements" were not that great if you happened to be a woman, gay or any other minority. The upsides to HR, employment regulation and so on has been making the office a far better place to work for a lot of people. While I agree that there are rampant problems in a lot of sectors, from low skilled to medical, there have…
Quoted post unavailable.
That all being said this particular arena is one that's so fraught with tiny little edges that all stack up to benefit certain classes of people unequally it unfortunately feels necessary to be explicit and precise. Ultimately this power is a zero sum game, and for and a more equal world means we must take power from some people and give it to others. That's almost never a thing that happens voluntarily, even if the will is there. It's very easy to argue for a status quo that benefits you, especially if the advantages you gain are easy to lie to yourself about.
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” ― Upton Sinclair
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#356Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I've read that doctors now spend as much as 50% of their time documenting their work. Companies such as Epic, which provide the software that hospitals use to build databases of patient data, have been big winners in the new world of hospitals-depending-on-software. But did the doctors become more productive? By almost any measure, they became less productive. It’s less the software, and more the users, site-specif…
> Another study found US clinicians write 4x longer notes I wasn't aware of this, but as the spouse of a medical provider I know that most US providers are burdened with an ever-present worry about malpractice.
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#358The very important context is that productivity sharply rose in 2020, in the middle of the Covid recession. The recent drop in productivity is mostly just a return to pre-pandemic baseline. The simplest explanation is probably just that the workers who were laid off during Covid were the least productive, and so average worker output went up, then fell as they re-entered the labor force. Or maybe even just there was…
Did you even bother to click on the article before typing your opinion of what happened? Their chart shows we are far below any sort of pre-pandemic baseline.
So that graph does not say we've dropped below pre-pandemic levels.... according to this report (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm): "Output and hours worked in the nonfarm business sector are now 3.1 percent and 1.5 percent above their fourth-quarter 2019 levels, respectively."
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#359These things always really need a giant flashing neon note that "productivity" doesn't mean how much workers get done but how much money is made off of what workers get done. They're only loosely connected, and most productivity gains have come from workers having to "do less" to "make more".
Weird story: From the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s, as-measured productivity significantly declined and then stayed at a lower level. This was during the initial few generations of technological impact on industry, including "just-in-time" inventory which kind of requires computerization. Yet, at this same time, "bosses and economists" were seen in public wondering if computers weren't a net negative on industrial prod…
That really was a net negative eventually. Covid managed to completely wreck the worldwide supply chains because of that idiotic approach. God forbid anyone keep any buffer in case anything happens.
Re: U.S. workers have gotten less productive – no one is sure why
#360I've read that doctors now spend as much as 50% of their time documenting their work. Companies such as Epic, which provide the software that hospitals use to build databases of patient data, have been big winners in the new world of hospitals-depending-on-software. But did the doctors become more productive? By almost any measure, they became less productive. People in tech keep thinking more tech will solve problem…
Everyone was very busy but it was very hard to get actual care.