Live data from Hacker News

Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

theautopian.com

341–350 of 392 posts

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#341
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BMW is not bad (I own one) but try turning off the air conditioner some time.

I’ve got an off button in the center of my controls. The only oddity is that I have to press it to lower the airflow from 5 to 0 (off) but otherwise pretty easy to find and use. It says “OFF.”

That turns off the entire climate control system, not just the air conditioner.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#342
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, then why buy it? This has been the case for years (a decade?).

Does the average person who has never owned a Tesla know the updates work that way? And how many of the Tesla owners still dislike it, but have decided that the risk (which could have been prevented by Tesla) is worth the reward?

“Average persons” don’t but $50-100k cars. Or new technology like Tesla was for many years.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#343
post #2

Someone in the comments pointed out that not only is this terrible, you can only open the glove box while stationary. I thought GM had jumped the shark when they started leaving the reverse lights on when you park, just to make sure people or cars nearby don’t know whether it’s safe to pass you in the parking lot. This is a whole new level of stupidity.

Holy shit, is that why I see this more often now?

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#344
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, then why buy it? This has been the case for years (a decade?).

Does the average person who has never owned a Tesla know the updates work that way? And how many of the Tesla owners still dislike it, but have decided that the risk (which could have been prevented by Tesla) is worth the reward?

I agree with the other commenter, as Teslas and EVs are still "crossing the chasm" and are primarily purchased by enthusiasts.

Also, who is buying such expensive cars without any idea how they operate?

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#345
post #2

Someone in the comments pointed out that not only is this terrible, you can only open the glove box while stationary. I thought GM had jumped the shark when they started leaving the reverse lights on when you park, just to make sure people or cars nearby don’t know whether it’s safe to pass you in the parking lot. This is a whole new level of stupidity.

Holy shit, is that why I see this more often now?

Yep. GM sells a ton of cars, and of course it’s not the driver who’s inconvenienced, so people never turn the feature off.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#346
post #217

? If you don't want it don't buy the car? I fail to see the issue.

This is the kind of “feature” which you may not realize you’re buying.

Also, the earlier we raise a stink about the incredible user hostility of something that can’t be opened in motion, and can’t be opened with a dead battery, the better the chances that it won’t be widely adopted.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your argument basically boils down to you don’t really use your glove box and prefer the slightly cleaner aesthetics. In your case you might argue for a car that doesn’t have a glove box. But if the glove box is included it should be intended for use. To not be able to access it by the passenger while driving, or while the car is off can be very frustrating for people who like to have a glove box.

All the comments on this thread seem to ignore a basic simple truth. On long road trips with passengers, they often use the glovebox to store things. When we go on road trips the kids rotate sitting in the passenger seat. They store their books, kindle, phone, etc there as it is a very convenient storage space easily accessible to them.

And in the event of a crash it’s safer to have items in the glove box than lying around waiting to become projectiles.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#348
post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve got an off button in the center of my controls. The only oddity is that I have to press it to lower the airflow from 5 to 0 (off) but otherwise pretty easy to find and use. It says “OFF.”

That turns off the entire climate control system, not just the air conditioner.

I misunderstood what you were looking for. AC seems easier for me as there’s a button labeled “A/C” that is lit up when AC is turned on and not lit up when it is off.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the system still disabled if someone is present in the front passenger seat (modern vehicles have sensors for this)? Oftentimes the passenger acts as the navigator and it wouldn't make sense for them to be locked out of the system.

Yes, it has been a while since i've been in her car.. i think you actually need to put it in park to "unlock" it, not just be stopped. This is why I said the system is very stupid.. one would think that a passenger can access the navigation system given they are not driving. The lesson I took away from this is: Never buy a car with a built-in GPS system. Android auto/carplay are a much better - They are not likely to…

It's weird that they didn't think of the simplest solution, which is to use the speedometer, and instead chose to use GPS. I suppose that makes it so you can't even use the nav if you happen to be riding on a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roll-on/roll-off .

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#350
post #199

From (the) experience(s of many, many people), I've learned that GM makes mechanically terrible cars. Digitizing a handle that doesn't even require a lock tells me that they're simply bad at design and build across many domains. So my misunderstanding is, why does anyone with enough money to finance a new car, ever, buy GM? What do people see in their cars?

They used to be good. I guess it's somewhat like IBM.

(Owner of early 70s GM.)

Post reply on HN