Live data from Hacker News

Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

theautopian.com

121–130 of 392 posts

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#122
post #89

GM also has electronic primary door release mechanisms in their vehicles. So if the car has no power, you can’t open the doors from inside. Granted, because of regulatory requirements there is STILL A MANUAL RELEASE… on the floor, near the chassis sill (and might be driver-seat only). So you save money going to electronic releases, but still have to put a manual one in anyways. The glovebox is merely annoying (though…

if you're doors won't open when the power goes out, that is just frikkin' stupid.

Not only stupid. That is plain criminal.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#125
post #75
post #3

I read on another forum that there isn't even a manual release somewhere. I understand for security it's nice not to but maybe hide one _somewhere_ so at least you have some backup option in an emergency?

Find out how to shift your car into neutral with a dead battery. For many cars, it involves popping off the cover around the shifter and holding two tabs out of the way - here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEui4r1AKhg Also works if you don't have the key, which can be useful.

I just drive a manual. Makes it easy to get into neutral.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#126
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "perceived cons" - it causes accidents. It is distracting.

In 1930, laws were proposed in Massachusetts and St. Louis to ban radios while driving. According to automotive historian Michael Lamm, “Opponents of car radios argued that they distracted drivers and caused accidents, that tuning them took a driver’s attention away from the road, and that music could lull a driver to sleep.” https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/29631/when-car-radio-was...

I am not sure what your point is here?

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#128

I hate a lot of the touch screen controls in the Tesla - like AC controls. But the glovebox is actually pretty nice. Being software controlled means I can require a PIN to open it. Also, there's no handle so it doesn't even look like a glovebox is there. If someone breaks in they probably aren't getting to any valuables in the glovebox.

I’m the exact opposite of you. I like most of the touch screen controls, including the AC ones, but the number of taps it takes to open the glovebox always irritates me.

Yes. AC is ok to not be so accessible. After all, if the car has a decent temperature regulation system (as it should), with a decent PID, you set up the temperature once and don't touch it for long time.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#129

I don't want touch screens in cars period and I can't stand this trend of using them. I'm finally starting to understand the feelings my grandfather had for anything thing he considered superfluous or inconvenient in a car.

The round knob to increase / decrease sound volume is simply the best UX in the car. Why do I have to navigate to a submenu to push a button repeatedly to change the volume. The less I look at the road the higher the risk of an accident.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#130
post #124

Next: glove box pro. 10 daily opens; lights up; no content restrictions; 4.99/month

Or wait: you can get it for free, but it will show an ad each time you open it! --We should not mention it, and give the idea to the OEMs...

“The glove box will open after you watched this ad from Geico. Have a nice day!”
Post reply on HN