Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's avoid disinfo. Neither account was banned to begin with. Both accounts were restricted, which could be lifted after the user deletes the offending tweet. It's overwhelmingly likely Musk had nothing to do with either case (and he said so himself). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/technology/kanye-ye-twitt...
Oh come on, that’s like saying someone isn’t being tortured, just temporarily having their pleasure removed until they confess.
“Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
201–210 of 1001 posts
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's avoid disinfo. Neither account was banned to begin with. Both accounts were restricted, which could be lifted after the user deletes the offending tweet. It's overwhelmingly likely Musk had nothing to do with either case (and he said so himself). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/technology/kanye-ye-twitt...
Oh come on, that’s like saying someone isn’t being tortured, just temporarily having their pleasure removed until they confess.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#203Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#204This sort of justifies the viewpoint that despite all his bluster, Elon will probably run Twitter the way a "reasonable executive" would. Not just release the hounds. Keep the advertisers happy, but try to reduce the reliance on advertisers. Keep moderating content to reduce abuse, maybe eliminate the high profile banning but a person on the ground will have largely the same experience. (probably less action on more…
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#205This sort of justifies the viewpoint that despite all his bluster, Elon will probably run Twitter the way a "reasonable executive" would. Not just release the hounds. Keep the advertisers happy, but try to reduce the reliance on advertisers. Keep moderating content to reduce abuse, maybe eliminate the high profile banning but a person on the ground will have largely the same experience. (probably less action on more…
A bunch of accounts like The Babylon Bee and Ye have been unbanned w/o input from any such committee of diverse viewpoints. I don't have much faith that Musk will not act unilaterally in service of his friends and allies.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Internet would have us believe that civil war is imminent. The person who could arguably be considered the third most powerful politician in the US just had their own broken into and their spouse assaulted in a suspected act of domestic terrorism. I wouldn't say "imminent" but if you don't think the possibility is at least somewhere on the table I would consider that being naive.
And you've got MAGA "prophets" out there "prophesying" about the "Angel of Death" visiting their political opponents before the end of 2022.
Still not as bad or unstable as the 1960s.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
Musk is way over his head. If you view the 4chan forums, they're already plotting racist, anti-semitic content and rejoicing. Advertisers will not be happy real quick.
Right wing provocateurs are already having their supporters posting the n-word, racist and anti LGBTQ content since Elon took over. It is going to be fun watching it implode.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone in the world can reply to your tweets. You see replies. Harassment is a huge problem on Twitter.
No? You can set your tweets to by replied to by only those you follow, or only those you mention.
Anyway, you can also make your account protected, so that nobody can see or reply to your tweets unless you approve. However, I would say it's not fair to claim that "you are using Twitter incorrectly" if you don't make your account protected, or if you don't restrict replies to every tweet you write.
Even if you restrict replies, people can still quote-tweet dunk on you.
What's the point of a "social network" if you use all the most "antisocial" settings?
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Supreme Court justices, despite their huge partisan differences and passionate disagreements on many individual cases, often talk about how they personally enjoy working with each other. My impression is that this is true of many Congressional committees as well, although it's less legible there because most congressmembers find it politically advantageous to talk about how mad they are at the other party.
There's a huge amount of history there, though. It didn't just get formed this week. It's got some members who have been on the court since the early 90s. Some since the late 90s and others in the aughts. The SCOTUS has long-lived institutional memory and norms of behavior. It's members also tend to become somewhat isolated from what's going on in the culture outside.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#210This sort of justifies the viewpoint that despite all his bluster, Elon will probably run Twitter the way a "reasonable executive" would. Not just release the hounds. Keep the advertisers happy, but try to reduce the reliance on advertisers. Keep moderating content to reduce abuse, maybe eliminate the high profile banning but a person on the ground will have largely the same experience. (probably less action on more…
This is rather confusing to me. Earlier this year he seemed pretty set on the idea of allowing whatever's legal, making Twitter all about free speech. But now it'll just get some minor changes? If it's true, why the change of heart?