Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
ourworldindata.org
Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
1–10 of 447 posts
Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#2If you, like me, wondered about poultry ...
"Here we focus on mammal populations, so neither wild birds or poultry are included. But for birds the story is similar: our poultry biomass is more than twice that of wild birds. "
Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#3Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#4How is there still an ecosystem?
Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#5Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#6How is there still an ecosystem?
1) Life is remarkably adaptive. 2) There probably won't be much longer.
Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#7becoming a sustainable food item is actually a great survival strategy at the level of the species, something to consider should earth ever be invaded by hungry aliens
Re: Wild mammal biomass has declined by 85% since the rise of humans
#8This statistic always takes the top of my head right off: "The dominance of humans today is clear: us and our livestock account for 96% of global mammal biomass. Wild land mammals make up just 2%." If you, like me, wondered about poultry ... "Here we focus on mammal populations, so neither wild birds or poultry are included. But for birds the story is similar: our poultry biomass is more than twice that of wild birds…