Is the SC namespace going to stay or is the code going to be refactored (ex: SC.Object becomes A.Object)? Just curious.
For the name, how about dotbind.js :)? (I LOVE SC.Binding)
Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
31–40 of 67 posts
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#32rename it to porter.js
porters are delicious beers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29) and porters (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28carrier%29 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28railroad%29) help everyone get things done.
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#33bikeshed.js?
There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things.
-- Phil Karlton
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#34If you "feel sheepish about the whole thing" isn't the right thing to do pretty clear?
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#35suggest: Sprouts.js
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#36If you "feel sheepish about the whole thing" isn't the right thing to do pretty clear?
I think he means that they feel sheepish about not having done more research about the name "Amber" before the announcement.
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#37If you end up changing the name (don't think you should), how about honeycomb.js
Brings thoughts of structure, order and productivity.
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#38rename it to porter.js porters are delicious beers ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29 ) and porters ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28carrier%29 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28railroad%29 ) help everyone get things done.
And porter beers usually have coffee (java) flavors.
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#39How about EmberJS ?
Domain name is available, it's similar to AmberJS but a little cooler.
Re: Poll: Should we rename Amber.js?
#40Stick with "Amber.js". Everything else would be more confusing as it is already ... and it's short! I like it :)