Better proxy to look at top line if you want a really rough picture of overall health.
Otherwise, you need to make meticulous adjustments to bottom line, justify those adjustments, and only then do you do a bit better than top line.
41–50 of 119 posts
Better proxy to look at top line if you want a really rough picture of overall health.
Otherwise, you need to make meticulous adjustments to bottom line, justify those adjustments, and only then do you do a bit better than top line.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's like to counter that Google's business customers and investors see these shut down stories likely in a different light: they stopped doing something that was a distraction from core business or irrelevant. Stadia was a powerful demonstration what Google is capable of, technology-wise.
So investors can count on Google to ax a product that's underperforming, but can't count on them to make competitive products, lasting brands or keeping loyal customers.
Yet they forced all Google workspace users that were grandfathered in free plans to start paying and are currently forcing grandfathered Google music (YouTube premium) family subscribers to eat a +50% price increase. Why would I stay with Google if my loyalty counts for nothing? Same goes for Netflix, if you aren't going to reward me being with you from day 1 why should I show you any loyalty? I will take full advant…
Pardon some humor: I laugh when non-tech friends don’t want to pay for ad-free YouTube but they will spend a ton of money every month at Starbucks.
Between lots of quality material on philosophy, beautiful background nature videos, Lex Firdman interviews, online class materials, Dust sci-fi short films, etc., etc. YouTube is probably the best value of anything I spend money for.
Yet they forced all Google workspace users that were grandfathered in free plans to start paying and are currently forcing grandfathered Google music (YouTube premium) family subscribers to eat a +50% price increase. Why would I stay with Google if my loyalty counts for nothing? Same goes for Netflix, if you aren't going to reward me being with you from day 1 why should I show you any loyalty? I will take full advant…
> Why would I stay with Google if my loyalty counts for nothing? Sure, I'll go get my ad-free YouTube from the competition
Yet their headcount grew by double digits. Many tech companies living in fantasy land, having gotten used to free money and strong organic growth essentially guaranteed from secular tailwinds. At a certain scale, and level of competition (more and more social/advertising platforms becoming popular), these companies become more cyclical rather than guaranteed growth bets. Google is a great company that will surely be…
Yet they forced all Google workspace users that were grandfathered in free plans to start paying and are currently forcing grandfathered Google music (YouTube premium) family subscribers to eat a +50% price increase. Why would I stay with Google if my loyalty counts for nothing? Same goes for Netflix, if you aren't going to reward me being with you from day 1 why should I show you any loyalty? I will take full advant…
> Why would I stay with Google if my loyalty counts for nothing? Sure, I'll go get my ad-free YouTube from the competition
This seems like a bit of a non-story in some ways. Their revenue was up slightly YOY, and after that crazy huge quarter and the economic slow down this seems like a non-deal.
If Google had announced that this would happen a quarter ago, then it would be a non-story. They failed to achieve their own predictions on both EPS and revenue, by quite a bit on EPS, and that is indeed a story.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much. The level of "a-ha! this confirms all my priors!" logic in these threads is just deafening. Look everyone: economies are cyclic. We had a boom. Now we're in a downturn. It's happened before, many times. It will happen again. Nothing happening today is remotely as scary as what we saw in 2008, frankly isn't nearly as disruptive as the 2001 crash. Google will be fine. The tech industry will be fine. Buy th…
> Nothing happening today is remotely as scary as what we saw in 2008 As what's happening "today" is basically a postponed and amplified version of what should have happened in 2008, I have to disagree.
I don't think today's economy is anything like the frothy housing bubble was in 2007/2008 timeframe.
I think there's a possibility of a tech bubble akin to 2001, but that actually wasn't very disruptive for our economy. I see today more similar to 2001, aside from the weird supply chain issues due to a greatly diminished workforce (the Baby Boomer's retirement is the biggest challenge for this year IMO). (Of course, people have been calling a bubble in tech for decades now, but _eventually_ that damn tech bubble will pop again, lol)