51–60 of 255 posts
I can't help but wonder how much the open sourcing of Stable Diffusion contributed to the decision to do this release.
Dick picks are the only infinitely renewable resource on this planet. Pretty sure Stable Diffusion isn’t the reason.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I realize that this isn't exactly Reddit, but good God man, has the capacity for a simple self-deprecating joke been lost here?
The issue isn't that it's self-deprecating, it's that it's not funny, esp. given the context. "Read the room" type of thing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a lot of DM spam on Twitter, TikTok, and Facebook/Instagram/Whatsapp involving explicit photos of female genitalia that would meet the criteria of obscene material under California's law[1] around sending unsolicited images by electronic means (SB 53). 1. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...
Are they sent by the women who own the genitalia? I have never once received an unwanted nude from a woman but as spam whereas with men it has happened enough times for me to believe without statistical justification that unwanted images of male genitalia would be more common.
I think a lot of unsolicited female genitalia is sent for spam/scam proposes. A particularly pernicious sort is in the form of sextortion [1]. Images of female genitalia may be sent by a criminal to entice a (typically young or teenage) boy into believing he’s engaging in an online romantic relationship with a real girl. When he reciprocates with images of his own body (as requested to do so), the criminal responds by using those images to blackmail him into paying money with the threat of exposing him to friends and family. This sort of attack has also been used to target girls, though recently the targeting of boys has grown much faster. If I had to speculate, criminals likely see young boys as easier targets who can be enticed with images of the female body.
I'm most interested in how they handle it for the users. It says potential "nudes" are blurred and can be "reported" or viewed. Will it tell the sender they're sending something that's going to be blurred? (which on one hand would let them resolve a false positive but also maybe let them find an adversarial image).
I'd note that the title here is slightly misleading. It doesn't do anything to check if the pics are solicited or not.
Does this mean it can also detect "send nudes" to avoid false positives on solicited lewd images? Or does the UI have a on/off toggle for currently-accepting-lewd-images?
I can't help but wonder how much the open sourcing of Stable Diffusion contributed to the decision to do this release.