WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
github.com
WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#2I already use fido2 on Linux with a hardware key for a while now. So I'm finding this a bit confusing.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#3Is this software to emulate fido2 without a hardware key, or is it software to allow non Web clients to access fido2 devices, or something else ? I already use fido2 on Linux with a hardware key for a while now. So I'm finding this a bit confusing.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#4Is this software to emulate fido2 without a hardware key, or is it software to allow non Web clients to access fido2 devices, or something else ? I already use fido2 on Linux with a hardware key for a while now. So I'm finding this a bit confusing.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#5Don't those platforms all rely on strict sandboxing and code signing, so that funny-dancing-monkey.exe can't rename itself to google-chrome.exe then perform a passwordless sign-on to google.com ?
I always thought this stuff was slow to arrive on Linux because it demands things that are incompatible with the free-software ethos.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#6> Windows Hello, Android's FIDO2 support, Apple's TouchID and FaceID, are all examples of platform authenticators. There is no reason why the Linux desktop community could not enjoy similar benefits Don't those platforms all rely on strict sandboxing and code signing, so that funny-dancing-monkey.exe can't rename itself to google-chrome.exe then perform a passwordless sign-on to google.com ? I always thought this stu…
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#7> Windows Hello, Android's FIDO2 support, Apple's TouchID and FaceID, are all examples of platform authenticators. There is no reason why the Linux desktop community could not enjoy similar benefits Don't those platforms all rely on strict sandboxing and code signing, so that funny-dancing-monkey.exe can't rename itself to google-chrome.exe then perform a passwordless sign-on to google.com ? I always thought this stu…
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#8Is this software to emulate fido2 without a hardware key, or is it software to allow non Web clients to access fido2 devices, or something else ? I already use fido2 on Linux with a hardware key for a while now. So I'm finding this a bit confusing.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#9Is this software to emulate fido2 without a hardware key, or is it software to allow non Web clients to access fido2 devices, or something else ? I already use fido2 on Linux with a hardware key for a while now. So I'm finding this a bit confusing.
The primary benefit is that Firefox wants Rust-language code for FIDO2 support, so hopefully this library will (eventually) fill that gap and get Firefox-on-Linux to proper FIDO2 Webauthn support.
Re: WebAuthN and Fido for Linux
#10> Windows Hello, Android's FIDO2 support, Apple's TouchID and FaceID, are all examples of platform authenticators. There is no reason why the Linux desktop community could not enjoy similar benefits Don't those platforms all rely on strict sandboxing and code signing, so that funny-dancing-monkey.exe can't rename itself to google-chrome.exe then perform a passwordless sign-on to google.com ? I always thought this stu…
You can do strict sandboxing on Linux, too (e. g. with Flatpak).
If you want to stop malicious applications from doing malicious things, even when the system owner unwisely grants them permission, you need mandatory sandboxing that the system owner can't bypass.
And that isn't compatible with the free software ethos.