Earlier quoted context omitted.
>So why aren't we reading articles saying 'Sales of Samsung USB cables banned' This almost borders on the deliberately obtuse, here. The USB cable doesn't exist in isolation, a decorative piece in the packaging, to be displayed on your desk as the proud owner of a Samsung product. The cable plugs into the tablets Samsung is selling . Only those tablets, no others. The cables serve no other use. These tablets have a p…
Or they could design a new cable? Apple are asking them to change a whole load of things - colour, size, proportionality etc. Why not just ask them to change the cable? Let's put it the other way - if someone came out and said they had a patent on some part of Apple's power cable - be it a design patent or a technology one - would you say that Apple would have to stop selling iPads? Or just stop selling those particu…
And a new port. Given the scenario where that cable is banned, they'd need to replace the port on every existing tablet they've sold. This is a linchpin.
The point is that this isn't something that exists in isolation. This is evidence that suggests Samsung is comfortable ripping off Apple, and did so. Pretty blatantly. And so if they did it here, you think they didn't do it elsewhere in their industrial design?