Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s boneheaded stuff like this that turned me against most accessibility laws in general. They sound like a good idea, but the implementations tend to make the perfect the enemy of the good and raise the barrier to entry too high for anyone who doesn’t have their own legal team.
There needs to be a system where accessibility issues can be raised and addressed without allowing attorneys to profiteer from the system.
Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
131–140 of 450 posts
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
"If it were wrong it would be illegal."
Quoted post unavailable.
These legal rackets know if they hit you for something you can afford to pay and keep your business running, that you aren't likely to throw it all away for empty vengeance. Cameras are everywhere now.
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#133It is really easy to add subtitles to videos now-a-days
(Because that is what he is being asked / required to do...)
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#134This is like saying you can't post a poster on a bulletin board if it doesn't follow a specific format. These laws make no sense and are a perfect example of out-of-touch policy. It should be my prerogative as to whether or not I care about the disabled market. I _should_ care if I'm a good person, but it shouldn't prevent me from being able to serve other markets.
One Saturday morning 3 months ago I got on my bike like I had the week before, and the week before that. Less than 30 minutes later I was splayed out on the ground with my lower right leg broken clean in half and my tibia sticking out of my shin while an onlookers called me an ambulance. For 2 months afterwards I was confined to wheelchairs and walkers, and I only just recently was able to start walking independently…
The US ADA has struck a pretty decent balance, few people are actively against wheelchair ramps, and elevators do add to the cost of a building but most buildings of that size are moderately expensive anyway.
But imagine if it was determined that the ADA required wheelchair ramps be installed at any house that was offering candy for trick-or-treating. The result would be entirely predictable; trick-or-treating would die out.
Much of this (and perhaps this case here) could be solved by forbidding the lawyers from profiting from it - you can sue someone for violating the ADA but you can't "win damages" - any such damages won would go to the state to help provide ADA accessibility.
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> companies doing that Doing which, making services unavailable to disabled people or suing those that do? I mean if my health insurer, for example, couldn't accommodate a disability of mine, especially something as common as low vision or hearing, I'd certainly feel like getting revenge but doesn't everyone feel that way about every health insurer every year or two? If you meant the other way around, like if someone…
I object to abuse of the ADA. Businesses / organizations should be given an opportunity to remediate their web sites before an automated script files an erroneous lawsuit.
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#136Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
There needs to be a system where accessibility issues can be raised and addressed without allowing attorneys to profiteer from the system.
Do you understand that "issues can be raised" is necessarily a euphemism for "people can be threatened with fines, bankruptcy, or jail time"?
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Conflating "willingness to do" with "ability to pay" is a fundamental attribution error.
ok, not willing-and-able then.
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> companies doing that Doing which, making services unavailable to disabled people or suing those that do? I mean if my health insurer, for example, couldn't accommodate a disability of mine, especially something as common as low vision or hearing, I'd certainly feel like getting revenge but doesn't everyone feel that way about every health insurer every year or two? If you meant the other way around, like if someone…
You think these people are champions of the disabled?
If a disabled person wanted to see the video, and could not, and asked them for help, that would be one thing. This ain't that. They're fucking vultures, they are in this to make money off of as many people as possible, regardless of the harm they cause. This is no more sane than the Texas law that allows people to be amateur bounty hunters and dogpile on anyone who might have played any kind of role in any woman's abortion.
Re: Thanks to the Israeli accessibility law, I have to delete my websites
#140Wouldn’t an easy fix be to switch to a domain managed by a more sane organization? Like .com? And of course not use an Israeli hosting providers.
Looking at the sites on wayback[1], and it appears that they are all Hebrew language tutorials, so I suspect the '.il' TLD is an important signal to potential victors in this regard. And since this means the audience is almost entirely Israeli, it doesn't make much sense from a web performance perspective to host elsewhere. Just my $0.02. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20220513045030/http://www.python...