Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know for the US worker, they seems to be able to take any abuse and ask for more free market in their ass. But that stuff would not fly in places where workers have some leverage and can influence policies. ( Or let's be more real : influence policies roll-out and eventually stopping them for a few years )
Citations needed. As someone who works in an international environment and routinely taveles between sites run by international conglomerates workers in Europe for example are not better protected than workers in the US, they've simply ceded more control to government. The real difference between European and US workers is in sheer productivity. Sure, Americans work more hours but they also get more done in those hou…
I come to that at this end.
I will start by giving the at-will contract example of poor US worker protection. Those at-will contract are not contracts. They describe in great lengths that you don't have any relationship with your employer. No string attach! Great, I wonder who benefit more from it?
That has deep consequences, and the result is when I work in the US i feel a Damocles sword upon me, while in Europe I feel deeply secure. ( for the
The why comes down to those questions.
- Can you be fired without cause and not get compensated?
- What is your level of compensation if you do get fired ( with or without cause)? For how long?
- Does your employers have to contribute to your retirement funds?
- What happen to your retirement fund if the economy goes to shit? Where was the money all along?
- What are your recourse in case of a disagreement with your employers? Can you realistically exercise those resources on a tie budget and limited time ( eg: single mother working full time for minimal wage )
---
The fun part :
> Sure, Americans work more hours but they also get more done in those hours.
No.
Pretty sure you are mislead. From memory the most productive place on earth is some western European country like Luxembourg or Belgium. They work less but produce a similar output of GDP.
Let me find a source on that.
Yeah. GPD per hour: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/most-prod...
The US is just behind France. In 8th position.
French workers contribute $79.70 to the GDP (PPP) per hour worked. France’s workweeks are the fifth-shortest among OECD countries at 38.9 hours. France’s productivity is about 25% higher than the OECD average and EU averages.
While
US workers contribute $79.60 to the GDP. American full-time employees work 41.5 hours per week, and about 11.1% of employees work over 50 hours per week.
So, that for productivity, seems comparable in term of GDP. But then ...
A macdonald worker has 5 week vacation / years, per law in France. That's a starting point.
The work week is 35h/week, per law. ( people work 40h, but they get 5h/week of extra vacation on top of the mandatory 5 weeks )
So, to build on that example, French work less but the holy-GDP per hour worked is slightly better than the US.
And they get slightly more respect show to them in the form of predictable, enforceable and protective contracts.
I don't know what's wrong with the US. I looks like diminishing return on pressuring your worker into more work?