Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except neither of those would help in this case. They’re already using their own domain name, and it’s unclear how they would even build their own CDN since they’re using that scale of bandwidth - AdGuard said they’re still pushing 100tb of access denied pages a month for their similar case. That is a LOT of bandwidth just for access denied messages.
Access Denied is an HTTP status code, not a page that you serve. 100Tb per month of status codes suggests something like 30 trillion requests per month. Is that possible?
EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
341–350 of 439 posts
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could be done with a gzip bomb.
Or a brotli bomb, for far greater expansion!
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#343Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#344Just block all of India for a week. That’ll sharpen minds a bit to track down the culprit And given that this seems like a near existential threat drastic action seems warranted.
Better yet, serve an empty file to the offending user agents
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#345A great opportunity right now for CloudFlare to win some goodwill and PR by helping out EasyList for free right now. But what about simply enable a firewall and show captcha or similar if the origin IP is from India and requesting that URL until the situation is under control? I did that with the free plan recently in CloudFlare in a similar situation and it worked perfectly (of course on a much smaller scale).
Pwned Passwords project by Troy Hunt is served by CloudFlare cache. I don't know scale of bandwidth usage by Pwned Passwords. But CloudFlare can definitely make the similar arrangement here too.
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except it wouldn’t make them resilient since, as I pointed out, neither of the things they did would be of any help at all to Easylist in this situation. It’s great that they’re happy with their choices, but the choices would, in this same situation, likely saddle them with a crippled infrastructure and/or some insane bandwidth bills for suddenly pushing 100 extra TB/m.
100 TB/month is only like 40 mb/s I can find VPS that advertise 200 mb/s dedicated for not much (but still way more than “free”)
On download.easylist.com have it shuffle and send a redirect to a mirror to download the list. I wonder if Universities are still offering these small amounts of space for Open Source projects?
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#347A great opportunity right now for CloudFlare to win some goodwill and PR by helping out EasyList for free right now. But what about simply enable a firewall and show captcha or similar if the origin IP is from India and requesting that URL until the situation is under control? I did that with the free plan recently in CloudFlare in a similar situation and it worked perfectly (of course on a much smaller scale).
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#348Google playstore will remove them.
Trust in the process.
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#349A great opportunity right now for CloudFlare to win some goodwill and PR by helping out EasyList for free right now. But what about simply enable a firewall and show captcha or similar if the origin IP is from India and requesting that URL until the situation is under control? I did that with the free plan recently in CloudFlare in a similar situation and it worked perfectly (of course on a much smaller scale).
I can't understand their argument that a text file 'isn't a web content'; seems like a bullshit excuse.
Re: EasyList is in trouble and so are many ad blockers
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
In case anyone is inspired to do related things, I made a mistake once (troubling and embarrassing), which I'll mention in case it helps someone else avoid my mistake... In earlier days of the Web, someone appeared to have hotlinked a photo from a page of mine, as their avatar/signature in some Web forum for another country, and it was eating up way too much bandwidth for my little site. I handled this in an annoyed…
I still have a 5k pixel square blank white gif on my site for times like that (~4kB) that I sub in for anything that gets requested too often, or from particular places. I was getting hotlinked from controversial sites a lot at one stage, and the common forum software they used didn't force image sizes. So a 5k pixel wide image pushed most of the content off the screen thanks to a centred element :)