Live data from Hacker News

Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays, winner = nearly double conversion rate

conversionvoodoo.com

1–10 of 42 posts

Re: Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays, winner = nearly double conversion rate

#4
post #2

I guess the target audience of that site celebrate Christmas, it's why they responded better to it.

That's accurate however the site is about as large / vanilla of a demographic as you can imagine.

EG - if you're selling to general population this is likely going to work.

Re: Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays, winner = nearly double conversion rate

#5
I think this is driven by the rejection of political correctness. In an ironic twist, I get the sense that more people are put off by politically correct language than are accomodated.

If there's a flaw in this strategy, it is that minorities are marginalized. You might avoid offending a Jewish (just an example) minority by using the term "Christmas", but you'll engender an emotional reaction in a larger number of people. By the numbers, this is a positive result. The question is whether or not you're ok with offending the minority, and to what degree?

Re: Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays, winner = nearly double conversion rate

#6
This is a nice PR piece: timed for a specific holiday on the calender (timely), hooks into larger discussion around manners and the "best way" to greet somebody (social hook), and ends up with real-world data on conversion ratios. (Give us the numbers!). Very nicely done.

Interesting trivia point: originally the phrase was "Happy Christmas," see "The Night Before Christmas" for a source. Can't help but wonder how "Happy Christmas" compares to the others?

Re: Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays, winner = nearly double conversion rate

#8
I assume the issue here is that "Merry Christmas YourName" is more likely to be perceived as a personal note whereas "Happy Holidays YourName" (or the more verbose version) sounds like a corporate greeting -- and one the reader therefore filters past.

Can someone explain to me how "open" rates are tracked? In all my mail clients I prevent remote images from loading automatically. I assume many people do the same. Is this tracking of open rates skewed as a result? Or maybe it just doesn't matter as long as you're just using it for comparison purposes?

Post reply on HN