Live data from Hacker News

North Paw

sensebridge.net

111–120 of 142 posts

Re: North Paw

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I ride a bike with a Garmin radar detector that tells me when a car is behind me. Adding a vibration motor to it would be neat.

Question - why is either of those options better than a mirror?

Why not use all of them? Saves having to glance at the mirror consistently, keeping your eyes on the road in front of you, while still having the mirror to check when your other sensor tells you to

Re: North Paw

#112
post #18

I'm pretty sure Lepht Anonym at one point was working on an implantable version of this.

That's the first thing I thought of! I'm pretty sure the South Paw was inspired by the North Paw.

Re: North Paw

#113
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I drive a Chevy Suburban (6 kids), its a huge car and can be hard to see my surroundings. When I'm backing out of a parking spot, it will vibrate the left or right side of my seat if a car is coming from the appropriate direction. It'll also do the same if it senses you're drifting into another lane or if you are changing lanes purposefully (blinker on) and someone is in my blindspot. It is extremely convenient

My math teacher would say that the wise Indian parks his horses the direction of escape. Why not back into the parking spot and pull out forward? The overreliance on tech is frightening.

This depends on the law in jurisdiction. For example... https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pompanobeach/latest/po...

> In all spaces marked for city administered public parking within the city, all vehicles shall be parked with the front end of the vehicle facing into the space provided for parking. It shall be unlawful for any person to back any vehicle into such parking space. No person shall stand or park a vehicle other than at the angle to the curb or into the roadway other than as indicated by signs or markings.

I recall this being the case in Palo Alto for city lots at one time and I believe that San Francisco city lots are similarly ordinanced.

Unless you know the city, it's safest to park "the standard way". No one wants to get a ticket in an out of state city.

Furthermore, there is some "unless you do have a backup camera, the backing into a spot between two cars is more difficult than going in forwards and then using the lot space upon leaving to properly orient."

Lastly, if you are to make use of the trunk of the car, most parking lots are set up to allow easier access when not backed in.

Re: North Paw

#114
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My math teacher would say that the wise Indian parks his horses the direction of escape. Why not back into the parking spot and pull out forward? The overreliance on tech is frightening.

This depends on the law in jurisdiction. For example... https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pompanobeach/latest/po... > In all spaces marked for city administered public parking within the city, all vehicles shall be parked with the front end of the vehicle facing into the space provided for parking. It shall be unlawful for any person to back any vehicle into such parking space. No person shall stand or park a veh…

The law discouraging safe driving practice. I don't... even...

Re: North Paw

#115
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My math teacher would say that the wise Indian parks his horses the direction of escape. Why not back into the parking spot and pull out forward? The overreliance on tech is frightening.

This depends on the law in jurisdiction. For example... https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pompanobeach/latest/po... > In all spaces marked for city administered public parking within the city, all vehicles shall be parked with the front end of the vehicle facing into the space provided for parking. It shall be unlawful for any person to back any vehicle into such parking space. No person shall stand or park a veh…

> I recall this being the case in Palo Alto for city lots at one time and I believe that San Francisco city lots are similarly ordinanced.

Anecdotally this does not seem to be the case any more, I live in the area and have never been ticketed for backing in. I usually don’t park any other way. You know, in case of zombies and I have to leave quickly.

> Unless you know the city, it's safest to park "the standard way”.

Depends on the city. Which requires…knowing the city? Or at least looking about. So I think that dismisses any idea that one should default to nose-in. Just park like everyone else is doing if you’re so worried. Only thing I’ve seen people ticketed for in SF is not curbing their wheels, which, likely you won’t notice or know about if you’re from out of town.

> Furthermore, there is some "unless you do have a backup camera, the backing into a spot between two cars is more difficult than going in forwards and then using the lot space upon leaving to properly orient."

This is only the case if you have never practiced backing up. It’s actually much easier to make precise movements when you’re reversing, due to the front wheel steering. I’m grateful that this was taught to me by my driving course.

> Lastly, if you are to make use of the trunk of the car, most parking lots are set up to allow easier access when not backed in.

This is true. I park nose-in at Costco.

Re: North Paw

#117
post #59

In a sport of orienteering (quite popular in Scandinavia and Switzerland) having perfect sense of the North as opposed to checking it with compass would offer a competitive advantage. I wonder if anyone tried to develop that.

Direction is the easy part. Good runners will have the planed route memorized by the time they start, they have 60 seconds to do this. The competetive advantage in orienteering is stamina.

Re: North Paw

#118
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Headband would require constant wearing of a hat. I would prefer a belt version.

Same but with a belt, I don’t wear a belt as a rule. This could easily be a Fitbit type device on wrist.

With the hat or belt, the device is aligned to the body. Wrist mounting would seem to add another degree of freedom. It could work, but the tech would have to be a lot higher.

Re: North Paw

#119
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Headband would require constant wearing of a hat. I would prefer a belt version.

Same but with a belt, I don’t wear a belt as a rule. This could easily be a Fitbit type device on wrist.

Why no belts?
Post reply on HN