Live data from Hacker News

Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

thechipletter.substack.com

31–40 of 48 posts

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#31
post #23
post #21

Wow... I did not expect to see the comments filled with a bunch of Canadian hate.

One thing that younger Canadians and foreigners don't seem to grasp is that Canada's economy is basically a handful of abusive corporations pretending to be a country. The Maritimes are dominated completely by the holdings of a single family. The West is dominated by resource extraction and banking. Ontario and Quebec are owned by banking and manufacturing families. And then there's Robellus... But that said, there's…

>One thing that younger Canadians and foreigners don't seem to grasp is that Canada's economy is basically a handful of abusive corporations pretending to be a country.

That's also true for Europe.

If you look at the top companies in Europe, most are 50 to 100 years old, with a sensible portion of their stake still in the hands of the family of the founders. HMLV, Nestle, Porsche, etc. you name it.

Any new innovative company gets immediately bought by US or Chinese money as the local money is too busy speculating on real estate.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#32

Quoted post unavailable.

>Canadian society and culture is generally incapable of excellence. Avro Arrow? ATI? Yoshua Bengio?

The Royal Canadian Mint seems to be pretty on the bleeding edge of their industry.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#34

Interesting article, but the one footnote reads: “It’s interesting how ‘Solid State’ and ‘Tek’ as an abbreviation for ‘Tech’ have disappeared from common use” SSDs would like a word

Thanks and very good point - I suppose I was thinking of the phrase 'Solid State Electronics' - but you're absolutely right.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#35
post #14
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Overpriced means it is priced so high people will not pay. The reality is with a low inventory and high demand levels prices will go higher. High demand justifies higher prices when inventory is low. I don't see demand reducing or inventory levels increasing for a few years interest rate notwithstanding. I would buy now because prices are only going up.

Some of what you said is correct except prices are going down because of interest rates. Also high real estate prices have hurt other areas of the economy. And the demand is largely due to money laundering out of China, not fundamentals.

Is the money laundering part of the fundamentals since it has been going on for so long

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#36
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And maybe held our politicians to account for the way our institutions are crumbling. It's strange to hear this complaint after a comparison to the States. I would dare say a vainglorious attitude doesn't seem to be helping.

That point is different than the other point. If you're not Canadian you wouldn't know that all our government institutions are way worse than they were, say, 10 years ago. Trying to access healthcare, trying to contact the CRA, trying to get a passport, etc... All these institutions have gone to shit fairly recently.

I am Canadian, and as bpye notes - it seems to be COVID pressure explaining the slowdown for those systems. I'm also unsure how "a bit more of their hustle and ambition" would get you your passport faster - hustle and ambition are famously not part of ANY government anywhere.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#37
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That point is different than the other point. If you're not Canadian you wouldn't know that all our government institutions are way worse than they were, say, 10 years ago. Trying to access healthcare, trying to contact the CRA, trying to get a passport, etc... All these institutions have gone to shit fairly recently.

I am Canadian, and as bpye notes - it seems to be COVID pressure explaining the slowdown for those systems. I'm also unsure how "a bit more of their hustle and ambition" would get you your passport faster - hustle and ambition are famously not part of ANY government anywhere.

They're two separate points.

1. Other countries have more ambition, hustle and grit on a cultural level.

2. Our institutions are decaying.

Maybe let's add a few more.

3. Oligarchs run the country.

4. People don't care and will defend our mediocrity.

Separate points. But all pertinent.

Also, in many ways, the attitude from our government does shape cultural attitudes as our federal government is by far the largest employer in the country.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Canadian society and culture is generally incapable of excellence. Avro Arrow? ATI? Yoshua Bengio?

There's a 10:1 population ratio of US to Canada. Do they expect 1:1 results? That'd be pretty extraordinary.

It's now 8.5:1.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#39
post #23
post #21

Wow... I did not expect to see the comments filled with a bunch of Canadian hate.

One thing that younger Canadians and foreigners don't seem to grasp is that Canada's economy is basically a handful of abusive corporations pretending to be a country. The Maritimes are dominated completely by the holdings of a single family. The West is dominated by resource extraction and banking. Ontario and Quebec are owned by banking and manufacturing families. And then there's Robellus... But that said, there's…

> One thing that younger Canadians and foreigners don't seem to grasp is that Canada's economy is basically a handful of abusive corporations pretending to be a country.

I think that's a gross oversimplification. There certainly is a tiny fraction of the population that holds the vast majority of Canada's wealth, but you could say the same of the US or really a lot of other countries, and it's not like all those companies have existed since confederation, so I don't think that's really a reasonable way to define Canada's economy. The Canadian GDP is $1.6 trillion USD, and those companies certainly have a hand in a lot of it, but you'd have to make a pretty long list of companies to even get to $1 trillion...

> But that said, there's also that raising Canadian capital is historically a fool's errand. Raising loonies is so hard it's basically pointless, it's almost always better for entrepreneurs to register as American corporations, pretend to be American, and raise American money. > > Because, at the end of the day, every party in Canada is beholden to their campaign financiers. Every party. And no money wants to flow outside of the proven channels.

It's more a function of Canadian banking and money management, at least historically, being far more conservative the the US's wild west. There's a reason Canada largely avoided the financial crisis of 2008, and it's not because Canadians are smarter than everyone else.

That said, it's fair to say there have been a number of Canadian tech startups that have done quite well for themselves, not to mention non-tech companies that have managed to be quite successful on the world stage. Maybe not at the same level as the US, but then, few countries can really measure up to that standard (and the consequences that come with it).

While I would say Canada's political parties are beholden to their campaign financiers, that hasn't exactly produced what I'd call "stability" in the political arena... and there's a fair bit of independence between the political arena and the economy (despite how inconvenient that is for some narratives). I wouldn't agree that money can't flow outside of proven channels for that reason. It's more that you have to make a much more solid case to get any significant funding from Canadian sources.

Re: Cash, Canadians and CPUs: Intel's 'Lost' Early Microprocessor

#40
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If given the chance to work and live in the states for $50k more, or in Europe for the same amount or less than I currently make, I might choose the latter for the novelty, but not the former to climb a ladder, so what's the comparison worth? That said, I'm not about to move to the suburbs where everyone and everything is pretty bland and same.

The difference is far from $50k in tech, it's far, far more and you can live in an actual city called new york unlike all of canada?

New York seems neat, but I sure as hell wouldn't want to live there. Pretty happy here in Vancouver. The rent and housing costs are absurd, but they'd be worse in New York. I like parts of the states quite a bit, but I don't think I'd like to live there, at least not long-term. Not my vibe.

People say the difference is much greater than $50k, but I think it's often overblown. You have the top few companies with crazy stock compensations on top of higher base salaries, but I'm not getting into those companies anyway. Some places can compete with that, but not as many as simply moving to the states, especially with no degree, and just automatically making so much more. It would be ladder climbing, and I don't care enough about hocking more bs products at people that I'd put so much of myself into that.

Post reply on HN