Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
theconversation.com
Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
1–10 of 46 posts
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#21.5 is locked in. Nothing short of a nuclear war will stop 2-3.
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#3Author is saying to not even think about all solutions? Unprompted, on a post ostensibly sharing research findings? Sounds a bit dogmatic and politically motivated. I don’t trust their results.
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#4Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#5Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#6Perhaps we should build an arc to help these species survive the anticipated hot period.
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#7Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#8> Relying on carbon dioxide removal and so-called negative emissions technologies to lower greenhouse gases in the atmosphere over several decades is too risky to contemplate. Author is saying to not even think about all solutions? Unprompted, on a post ostensibly sharing research findings? Sounds a bit dogmatic and politically motivated. I don’t trust their results.
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#9Who cares ? /s
Re: Temporarily overshooting 2°C would cause permanent damage to Earth’s species
#10> Relying on carbon dioxide removal and so-called negative emissions technologies to lower greenhouse gases in the atmosphere over several decades is too risky to contemplate. Author is saying to not even think about all solutions? Unprompted, on a post ostensibly sharing research findings? Sounds a bit dogmatic and politically motivated. I don’t trust their results.
The energy budget needed for CO2 removal makes all our energy consumption done to this point a rounding error.
Another possible solution would be finding a process that will remove CO2 as a byproduct. If you have to put a lot of energy into it, at least get some part of it back.