Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
21–30 of 272 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#22neovim - text editor
aerc - email
nzbget - usenet
irssi - chat
mpv - audio
still hoping for gemini to take over for a full terminal experience.
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#23Yes unless you work with language that "needs" an IDE like java, scala ect.
You can always load the IDE up as a Vim/Emacs plugin. I've used the Eclipse Language Server within Vim to some success in the past
Sure you can get away with it but vim plugin is no where close to what you can do in Idea. Not even in the same orbit.
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#24Personally I'm all in favor of having more open APIs and third party clients, but would never want to intentionally constrain myself to a TTY that is half a century old.
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#25For everything except web browsing, I use the terminal. neovim - text editor aerc - email nzbget - usenet irssi - chat mpv - audio still hoping for gemini to take over for a full terminal experience.
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#26Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#27- Multiple accounts: I have a per-account config file with the relevant specifics (https://github.com/wfleming/dotfiles/tree/arch-linux/home/co...) and use folder hooks to apply those depending on which mailbox I'm viewing (https://github.com/wfleming/dotfiles/blob/arch-linux/home/co...). (Plus a keybinding in each account file to make flipping to the next account easy.)
- Non-standard auth:
- I use offlineimap to sync my mail, and it supports oauth2 for Gmail. The arch wiki has helpful details: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/OfflineIMAP#Configuring_OAuth2_and_getting_access_tokens_via_mailctl
- For sending mail, I use msmtp, which also supports oauth2. Again, arch wiki has some helpful details. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Msmtp#OAuth2_Setup
For web & Slack, I sympathize and have toyed with CLI alternatives in the past, but I'm come to terms with the the fact that it's just not that feasible for the most part. Personally, I spend as much time in the terminal as I can, but I've given up on fighting against the tide for everything. The only native apps I usually have open are Firefox, Slack, and Spotify, and that's acceptable to me since it ends up meaning I still spend most of my day in a terminal.Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#28> - My company uses Slack's enterprise auth, and all the CLI slack clients I could find haven't been updated in years and no longer work. https://github.com/wee-slack/wee-slack is decent. > - The web is using more javascript than in the past. cli browsers are probably the only truly unrealistic thing. An idea that I've been kicking around for a while is to build a simple CLI "browser" that uses PhantomJS or similar u…
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#29Unless you're an absolute terminal power user that can masterfully navigate tmux, vim or whatever tools you use, I don't think it's a good use of time. There certainly are things where the terminal is the right tools, use it in those situations. Just ask yourself if you're artificially limiting yourself, simply because you think the cool kids use the terminal.
Re: Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
#30If you're not doing business, using the terminal works fine. Up until you have to deal with health insurance or your power bill or your taxes or bank.
Unfortunately the world now revolves around [gui] web browsers. We brought this technologically retarded hellscape on ourselves and we deserve it.