Live data from Hacker News

Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

bbc.co.uk

511–520 of 787 posts

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#511

Earlier quoted context omitted.

courts award damages based on ... damages

doesn't seem like it

the person I'm talking to seems to think that an actor with a smaller audience and smaller capacity to cause damages should be punished equally to someone with a bigger audience and bigger capacity to cause damages. with great power comes great responsibility, and the law reflects this

whether you think courts generally award damages appropriately or not is beside the point

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#512

The people who released opioids upon the American public didn't get fines like this. Insane

Jones did an impressive job of maximizing his liability directly via his words on the stand. Pharmaceutical companies, in general, know how to listen to their lawyers and shut the hell up.

Just "know how to listen". Alex listens to no one which was clear in both trials and also why he couldn't keep an attorney.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#513

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

They aren't independent actors because they were highly impressionable people whose actions were influenced by Jone's lies.

That's such bullshit

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#514

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Okay bud. The common law has been developing for hundreds of years. It is an extraordinary institution and an important part of Western traditions. At its best, the common law has allowed a finely balanced rule to develop - not in a vacuum, but incrementally and iteratively proven in thousands of real-world cases. Some of the best minds of our civilizations have tussled over these guidelines, and the more lawsuits th…

I much prefer the civil code.

I don't know much about it, but many great countries agree with you in practice and so it must have a lot going for it. Still, I like the bottom-up approach the common law provides.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#515
post #475

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's honestly pretty hard to work out what you're trying to assert here. The parent commenter is trying, reasonably, to establish the distinction between "lying" and "defamation". It seems like you're saying "being sued is so expensive the distinction doesn't matter". Ok, sure? That doesn't have anything to do with what they're saying, and, in the context of the grandparent comment --- about libel laws being tightene…

(Pedantic nitpicking) You mean anti -SLAPP laws. For others' curiosity: A SLAPP is Strategic lawsuit against public participation , a strategy for plaintiffs to silence opponents by way of burdening them with an onslaught of lawsuits and hoping they are scared away by potential legal costs of mounting a defense thereby resulting in them just giving up. The potential for this strategy to have chilling effects gave ris…

If anybody has made it this deep in the thread and has curiosity left to spare, I’d like to recommend https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/make-no-law/ , which is no longer active but whose episodes remain highly valuable in understanding first amendment law.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#516
post #404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a statement of my opinion, that rglover is a pedophile, that has personally been involved in sodomizing children in the greater New York metropolitan area, and does so frequently while working on plans to do terrorist activities in that city with a shadowy cabal of mostly (insert ethnicity here) figures. Now, my kind viewers on Hacker News, I have to attest that these are just my opinions, and as such, I cannot…

> I am free to make any statements I please, in any manner I please, and claim protection under the right to free speech Yes, you are. > things like defamation and libel law simply do not exist. I never said they didn't exist.

People should not be encouraged to nurture unsound opinions.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#517

As someone who's been closely following the Infowars/Free Speech Systems trials (watched all the depos, trial footage, etc.), all I can say is that I'm glad these families are finally getting justice. Even though I'm sure it'll be tied up in appeals for awhile (and reduced on appeal), hopefully it'll prevent future harassment campaigns against families when tragedies occur. And before anyone says "but why wasn't Jone…

First amendment isn’t under attack. Alex Jones isn’t being punished by the govt. Ge attacked people, they responded back. Defamation law has always existed and people can always sue you for libel and slander.

> First amendment isn’t under attack.

True, but...

> Alex Jones isn’t being punished by the govt.

The courts are part of the government, and Constitutional limits on government power apply to civil liability; the First Amendment, quite notably, restricts the conditions in which defamation liability can be applied.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#518

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did Hitler personally kill any Jews? Did Putin personally kill any Ukrainians? Sorry to invoke Godwin's law so early.

Did Alex Jones order anyone to do anything? Honest question.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stochastic_terrorism

He could have anticipated his actions would lead to these outcomes.

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#519
post #364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, it seems like he has personal assets in the high tens of millions of dollars, and that Free Speech Systems was probably worth into the 9 figures. If the verdict stands, all of that will get wiped out, and the question remaining will be whether the damages, which stem from an intentional tort, will be dischargeable when Jones is forced into bankruptcy non-ironically, rather than using it as a ploy. Still a lot of…

This always confused me, if someone is wiped out in this way how are they able to survive in the aftermath? Isn't this effectively sentencing them to homelessness forever, or is there a floor value in these wins that's always respected which accounts for some minimal cost amount of food+rent? And doesn't the responsibility to pay up remain for money made after the bankruptcy event? Or does declaring bankruptcy ensure…

>effectively sentencing them to homelessness forever

Not if you have lived in Florida for the past 40 months[0], which is why many professional athletes change their residency to Florida and start the clock on the day they sign their professional contract. It appears Alex missed a trick here.

[0]https://www.floridabankruptcynow.com/floridas-homestead-exem...

Re: Alex Jones told to pay $965M damages to Sandy Hook victims' families

#520
post #404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a statement of my opinion, that rglover is a pedophile, that has personally been involved in sodomizing children in the greater New York metropolitan area, and does so frequently while working on plans to do terrorist activities in that city with a shadowy cabal of mostly (insert ethnicity here) figures. Now, my kind viewers on Hacker News, I have to attest that these are just my opinions, and as such, I cannot…

> I am free to make any statements I please, in any manner I please, and claim protection under the right to free speech Yes, you are. > things like defamation and libel law simply do not exist. I never said they didn't exist.

I understand your response, but thankfully this community doesn't have to take the word of a terroristic pedophile truthfully. Thank god for your interpretation of the 1st amendment!
Post reply on HN