21–30 of 151 posts
Quoted post unavailable.
My perspective is that if it doesn't serve ads it likely doesn't have a future at Google. I would be interested in playing around with this tech, but I wouldn't integrate it into my business or any other part of my life.
It could be a product under Workspaces. Google Meet is widely used and with no advertisements.
[flagged]
This is more like a big TV you can sit close to and other people in the room who move slowly from left to right will be able to see a parallax effect on the screen.
2. I feel like the main thing holding back a normal video meeting or even voice call is latency - latency leads to the awkward pauses or interruptions that for me cause the most “connection friction”. If anyone here has talked on an actual landline recently, it feels qualitatively better than a teams voice call for example due to the decreased latency and ability to both talk at once. Solve this, and you solve 90% of the problem, imo
Being in New Zealand I remember the google balloon project, what happened to that?
I see this as a negative and not a positive. I have very little to no desire to ever spend money with either of those or have involvement with things that they make extensive use of.
1. Echoing all the comments here, can’t see google keeping this around for 5+ years 2. I feel like the main thing holding back a normal video meeting or even voice call is latency - latency leads to the awkward pauses or interruptions that for me cause the most “connection friction”. If anyone here has talked on an actual landline recently, it feels qualitatively better than a teams voice call for example due to the…