91–100 of 168 posts
I'm surprised by all the dismissive comments here. This is a really clever and thought-provoking idea, and I believe that is the spirit in which it is intended (rather than as an "actual" game).
It’s a brilliant, creative idea and the small-mindedness here is disappointing.
This might be brilliant and creative to you, but to some this is just not that impressive, technical or otherwise.
I'm surprised by all the dismissive comments here. This is a really clever and thought-provoking idea, and I believe that is the spirit in which it is intended (rather than as an "actual" game).
It seems more like an elaborate joke to me. I can see people being annoyed after being teased with the notion of a new game, only for it to be a gag.
I'm surprised by all the dismissive comments here. This is a really clever and thought-provoking idea, and I believe that is the spirit in which it is intended (rather than as an "actual" game).
I'm surprised by all the dismissive comments here. This is a really clever and thought-provoking idea, and I believe that is the spirit in which it is intended (rather than as an "actual" game).
When I want a game where a plumber gets warped into a mushroom kingdom and fights turtles by jumping on them, I want realism, dammit!
this is neat
I don’t get it, what am I missing
Imagine a normal brick in our world, what we see are projections of the outside surface, but we of course can't see inside the brick, not without breaking it at least, but then you end up with a series of smaller objects that you can only see from the outside, again.
Likewise, Mario wouldn't be able to see the shapes we see because we're looking at the totality of them, the outside and the inside, all at once, because we're 3D, but they are not.
He would only be able to see the outside, which in his case are the lines making up the contours of the bricks, goombas, etc.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s a brilliant, creative idea and the small-mindedness here is disappointing.
You can't call all criticism as small-mindedness. This might be brilliant and creative to you, but to some this is just not that impressive, technical or otherwise.
You appear to be hallucinating. Where did I do that?
> to some this is just not that impressive
Of course I agree with that point because, you know... opinions
I'm surprised by all the dismissive comments here. This is a really clever and thought-provoking idea, and I believe that is the spirit in which it is intended (rather than as an "actual" game).
- Site proudly uses no javascript Embedding the game into the browser using JS and WebGL seems like the obvious way to let people experience it easily. Most people aren't going to download it.