I can't believe they're making a site for individuals with ADHD that uses that many carousels.
Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
31–40 of 114 posts
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#32Is it just me or does the fact that this site already heavily pushes a particular conclusion rather than being open to all evidence lead others to take it with an extra grain of salt as well?
I'm getting adhd-as-a-lifestyle vibes off of this, and as someone who has ADHD I stay away from that mentality with every ounce of effort I can muster.
ADHD is a thing I have, not who I am.
Edit: The actual "statement" is a much better representation of what this site (and its organizers) are about:
https://www.adhdevidence.org/ics
Seriously, I'm stunned by how terrible the landing page is. If the person who built this is here, you've really got to quiet that landing page down, there's way too much going on. In particular, the AMA accordion component should be removed entirely.
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#33This looks cool, but it's not useful or interesting to me. I don't need to "heal from stigma and internalized ableism", I need to get things done and my brain is resistant to this. "stigma" and "ableism" is just psychobabble to me.
Even if you somehow don't care what other people think, stigma gets in the way of medication.
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#34> Surprisingly, data show that sugar consumption does not worsen symptoms of ADHD. Surprisingly? Sugar consumption is known to help with symptoms of ADHD, as do other dopamine-inducing activities, which makes perfect sense to me. The problem with sugar is that it has a pretty high cost due to all its other effects on the body, that its dopamine hit wears off pretty fast and you quickly build up a tolerance, which is…
That's sorta like the effect of caffeine on me. It's not only not a stimulant, but if I take in too much, I straight up get drowsy.
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#35I recommend this Huberman Labs podcast about ADHD: https://hubermanlab.com/adhd-and-how-anyone-can-improve-thei... Huberman is a neuroscientist and everything he recommends appears to be backed by peer reviewed research. He does also promote various products, but afaict, he does a good job of keeping that from biasing his recommendations.
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#36I have a feeling that the massive quantities of prescribed amphetamines we've dumped into the population, including millions of children, is going to age about as well as using radium for wristwatches. But I guess we'll have to see the "evidence" for that.
In situations where there is a dopamine deficiency, stimulants like amphetamines counterintuitively have the opposite effect than you would expect.
"I didn't know my brain could be this quiet," is a common refrain from people with ADHD on taking a stimulant for the first time.
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#37One of the recommendations, CBT, is inspired by NLP (heavily). I can say that NLP did wonders for me. Site is attrocious :)
That's really interesting that neuro linguistic programming helped you so much. I don't want to inquire into your own experiences as it's personal. But, I used to follow NLP very closely and sort of lost interest over time. Anyway, I felt it was best suited to 'software' changes in oneself - say at level of beliefs about the world, and how our use of symbols and language can affect our experience and abilities. ADHD,…
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#38Not much evidence on here, other than “avoid food colourants.”
Re: Evidence-based conclusions about ADHD
#39I have a feeling that the massive quantities of prescribed amphetamines we've dumped into the population, including millions of children, is going to age about as well as using radium for wristwatches. But I guess we'll have to see the "evidence" for that.