Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
21–30 of 484 posts
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#22Congrats to Apple and AMD for having done better
Microsoft ignoring AMD in their latest Surface lineup is a hint for the people looking for answers
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#23I worked at Intel and it kicked off my career. I believe putting a Cfo in charge of a company will lead to this. I wonder if apple will ever end up in the same situation
That sounds like what happened to Boeing.
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#24I love how the PC market slowdown is being headlined as causal when Intel has clearly done this to themselves. Maybe if Apple's products were still "Intel Inside" Intel wouldn't be in this position.
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#25Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#26Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#27I love how the PC market slowdown is being headlined as causal when Intel has clearly done this to themselves. Maybe if Apple's products were still "Intel Inside" Intel wouldn't be in this position.
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#28Damn, that's a lot of people. Wow.
Original text:
It is. The article does not say where this will occur.
They cannot lay off people from the EU like that. It's not that easy. Unlike the US, EU countries are welfare states.
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#29Damn, that's a lot of people. Wow.
Re: Intel plans thousands of job cuts in face of PC slowdown
#301) Completely missed the boat on mobile. Their ARM-competitive chips (Atom, etc.)... weren't. Missed on every measure from power to performance. Let Qualcomm and Samsung eat their lunch.
2) Missed too many ticks and replaced them with tocks. Fell far behind because of ridiculous tilt-at-windmill folly around Itanium and other architectural decisions that absolutely didn't pay off. Ended up taking way too long to get further down on process size.
3) Lost their competitive edge so much that Apple finally realized they can do it better and suffer the transitional costs of building a middleware layer to translate off of x86. Apple's fully committed to that, so Intel doesn't just lose the "no one is using a PC anymore" market, they're also losing the "those people who DO use home computers which happen to be Apples" market.
It's absolutely incredible to watch these formerly phenomenally innovative companies falter at that very core competency of staying cutting edge but we see it happen over and over again.