I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…
Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
241–250 of 649 posts
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#242I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#243I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…
Yes, this is an idiotic decision that makes me question the decisions being made as a whole by Signal. Does anyone have recommendations for a good default SMS app on Android?
Personally like TextraSMS. Has a free ad-supported version, but I paid to remove ads when it was on sale several years ago (maybe $1).
4.4 stars. I believe it's $3 or $5 to remove ads now.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.textra
Also surprised me the other day when a friend used an iOS reaction, and it applied it correctly on my end.
> Added support for Reactions (also known as Tapbacks) received from iOS Apple devices.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#244To hear that people use it in group chats is mind boggling to me.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do realise Telegram isn’t secure (non-e2ee), is Russian owned and is based in the Middle East. Enjoy whatever privacy that provides.
Mmm... You can use end-to-end encryption with Telegram if security is your main concern. I don't see how it being "Russian owned" is of any concern, but if you feel like privacy is an issue then you're free to claim their $300,000 prize at stake or just take part of their ongoing bug bounty programme and be rewarded by spotting flaws.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#246I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…
I couldn't care less about this.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal seem to have adopted the "Decisions, not Options"[^1] route way too well, so don't act surprised. This is why we need at least open source clients that can be forked when these decisions are made. [^1]: https://wordpress.org/about/philosophy/
I have never understood why decisions and options have to be mutually exclusive. Yes, you want to have a rock-solid, thoughtfully-design default install for new and casual users. You can still have an advanced control panel with everything a power user could want.
Taking that factor away - allowing people to mess it up - makes it easier for developers.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#248Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correction, you dont need the privacy* Telegram is absolutely the worst when it comes to privacy, it has access to everything you do and say. If you want a master app, have a lot at matrix.org with bridges.
That's false: Telegram doesn't have access to secret chats.
Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why do I need 3 apps (Android Messages, Signal, Whatsapp) to talk to people? Because Whatsapp and Signal are walled gardens. (Everyone knows why IM>sms)
> Whatsapp and Signal are walled gardens. Until next year? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220701IP...