CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
macobserver.com
CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#2I'm surprised it took them this long. The whole company stinks to high heaven.
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#3I'm surprised it took this long for a law firm to jump on this. This looks like a big payday for a few sharks and pennies for us.
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#4I'm surprised it took this long for a law firm to jump on this. This looks like a big payday for a few sharks and pennies for us.
It feels like in the US that in many areas of the law, enforcement has been outsourced to private enterprise. See eg regulatory capture of the SEC by the banks, Bush appointees in the FDA (Daniel Troy was appointed to be chief counsel; he essentially opposes the existence of the fda and is a tool of the drug companies [1]), Bush appointees to the EPA (Jeffrey Holmstead, who previously a lawyer for energy companies fighting pollution controls), Bush appointees to the USDA (Chuck Lambert, a former cattleman's association lobbyist who famously promised congress that mad cow would never enter the US 6 months before mad cow was found in the US, particularly in the context of the fight to prevent country of origin labeling), etc etc etc. Major governmental organizations have intentionally been prevented from carrying out enforcement of their areas of the law by appointing executives that oppose the relevant laws or policies. So lawyers, particularly with class action lawsuits, and NGOs such as the sierra club, Greenpeace, etc, use the courts to compel enforcement of the law.
[1] http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/030324/24fda...
[2] http://www.polluterwatch.com/jeffrey-holmstead
[3] http://www.kiwicando.com/Generic%20international%20activism%...
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#5MacObserver spam HN - 38 submissions just in the last week that push submissions from legitimate users out of sight that little bit faster.
http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=jmartellaro
http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=digiwizard
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#6MacObserver spam HN - 38 submissions just in the last week that push submissions from legitimate users out of sight that little bit faster. http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=jmartellaro http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=digiwizard http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=Semteksam http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=davethenerd
holy... 0_0
Is there anything people can do to stop those kinds of posts? Submitting a few articles from your own site is fair enough, but these are obviously blogspam.
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#7MacObserver spam HN - 38 submissions just in the last week that push submissions from legitimate users out of sight that little bit faster. http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=jmartellaro http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=digiwizard http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=Semteksam http://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=davethenerd
itworld & computerworlduk as well.
Re: CarrierIQ Sparks Class Action vs. Apple, Samsung, HTC, More
#8I'm surprised it took this long for a law firm to jump on this. This looks like a big payday for a few sharks and pennies for us.
I'm currently holding in my hand a check for the amount of zero dollars and thirteen cents from an eBay Motors class action settlement. I am sure that the attorneys in this case billed hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I'm sure that eBay spent similar amounts defending the case. The outcome is that the direct fees for mailing and postage of this letter cost an entire order of magnitude more than the actual reimbursement.
It's embarrassing to me that this is an acceptable outcome for a suit that is intended to protect and compensate consumers.