Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
121–130 of 145 posts
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#122Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#123Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
We have no proofs of a creator, period. Until that, the correct thing to do is to say there's no god until there's some evidence.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Our women Use of the possessive form noted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have no proofs of a creator, period. Until that, the correct thing to do is to say there's no god until there's some evidence.
There are many proofs. But some people are too blind or too proud to see them. You can check out provingislam.com for a teaser.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
The possessive suggests possession - as if the men of Iran own the women of Iran, and are sovereign over them, like an autocratic government is over its subjects. You may be aware of protests currently ongoing in Iran regarding distaste for this attitude amongst “your” Iranians.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many proofs. But some people are too blind or too proud to see them. You can check out provingislam.com for a teaser.
That's as scientific as a Marvel Comic Con. That just tries to align with your bias, there isn't any science on it.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
> No one is feeling threatened.
Oh yeah? Then why did they feel compelled to kill a young woman for the "horrible crime" of not covering her hair?
> You're the one projecting here.
Nope, it's definitely you. All that gibbering about STDs... It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair we can see.
And posting a YT playing list of some little scraggly-bearded mufti wannabe mullah spouting medieval superstition, as if that supports your position? It only further cements how wrong you are.
Re: Protests in Iran: State-run live TV hacked by protesters
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does GP's statement have anything to do with "nakedness" and "vices". Those appear to be your words, dude. Besides, the woman that was killed in custody that started this whole mess in Iran was hardly "naked", quite far from it. It's not the west's fault that people lack so much self-control they can't handle anything but a hijab. In my opinion that speaks incredibly poorly, if anything that means folks shold spe…
The slippery slope is real. And as far as we're concerned, taking the Hijab away is one very obvious step in that direction. Just look at history. I'm not defending the Iranian regime by the way. You're straw manning to assume that the Hijab's only reason is lack of self control. It's one part of many things that we have in Islam to preserve morality and purity. For example, both men and women are ordered to lower th…