Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ohh I miss the good old days of forums in general. I find all this new software, where conversions* are "threaded" stupidly hard to read. Even worse, when the software is trying to recommend to you, what to read. Back in the day you had a thread, every post to that thread was chronologically added to that thread and in case you wanted to reply to someone, you quoted them... sigh EDITED: *conversations
I find HN's approach very easy to read and follow. But then, each submission does not keep getting commented on indefinitely. Could get unwieldy then.
Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
81–90 of 161 posts
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also prefer reading threaded discussions, but are you aware of a good way of keeping track of new messages? That’s my main issue with threaded discussions, for example here on HN.
Notifications and sorting for new like reddit has.
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#83Here's my shameless plug: `pip install sqlitedao`: https://github.com/Aperocky/sqlitedao
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#84Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#85I commend you for hand rolling it all and not using JS. I miss the days of good ole forum software (e.g. FluxBB/PunBB) before it was superseded with massive JS bloat/clunky forum software like Discourse, Flarum, etc.
Sure something like phpBB is light, but the UX is also barely usable. Give me something like Reddit or Discourse over that any day. Why can't we have the best of both worlds?
Hackernews on the other hand manages to lack both (in some speculations intentionally), with neither usable design nor speed.
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#86May I recommend an ORM for any such project? hand rolling SQL statement aren't going to scale. Here's my shameless plug: `pip install sqlitedao`: https://github.com/Aperocky/sqlitedao
my experience optimizing SQL has been removing the ORM layer via hand rolling SQL queries.
Most of my peers also seem to agree that ORM is great for knocking a feature out, but you’ll inevitably run into performance concerns at scale and need to write your own optimized queries yourself.
I feel like with SQLite having limited resources, you’d likely want to optimize your queries as best you can without an ORM? Is that not the case?
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#87I commend you for hand rolling it all and not using JS. I miss the days of good ole forum software (e.g. FluxBB/PunBB) before it was superseded with massive JS bloat/clunky forum software like Discourse, Flarum, etc.
I do still wonder why the fast and responsive software can't invest a little bit into design in order to not look like complete shit. Sure something like phpBB is light, but the UX is also barely usable. Give me something like Reddit or Discourse over that any day. Why can't we have the best of both worlds? Hackernews on the other hand manages to lack both (in some speculations intentionally), with neither usable des…
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#88Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do people hate endless scrolling so much?
And you love it, so much ? It's probably the stupidest thing ever invented as far as UX goes.
Re: Show HN: Minimal, no-JS web forum software
#90Teddit works like a charm with disabled javascript, it supports css based thread collapsing, and cookie based information for logged out users as well (you can store which subreddits you follow).
> it supports css based thread collapsing I didn't knew but I love it... I wish more developers took interest in such things.