Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not what they are suggesting. That's what you came up with as a solution for the problem which they presented. You're arguing against your own conclusion.
The implication is obvious from the context of the discussion. Don’t be disingenuous.
Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
181–190 of 414 posts
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Japan's population is something like 98% Japanese ethnicity.
And you think racism has nothing to do with that being the case? Meaning why do you think a country as successful as Japan is not filled with a diversity of immigrants from other races?
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't get ahead of yourself there. Racial preferences are very common around the world. It becomes part of self-worth to value one's cohort above those that are seen as opressive. Such as the ubiquitous western culture in media. Anyway, the melting pot of the USA has created a dialog about race that may be missing or very small elsewhere. Witness the apparent race-tone-deaf attitudes in Japanese mainstream, where bei…
Japan is 98% ethnically homogenous, with the remaining 2% primarily consisting of Koreans and Chinese. I don't see why Japan would have any need for a discussion on 'race'.
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#184How does this differ from companies and elected officials openly saying right now that females and minorities are preferred for X position, like vice president of USA or CEO of Reddit?
Some people are running a marathon, half way through it is discovered half of them had been given weighted shoes that made them run significantly slower. The organizers and racers agree this is wrong and unfair, and so they make sure everyone has correct shoes for the rest of the race. Yet those half of the racers that had weighted shoes are several miles behind the rest. What would you suggest be done?
From a collectivist view, adding a time penalty that corresponds to which half the runner was in looks good.
From an individualist view, they note some runners who didn’t receive extra weight still got a debilitating amount of weight from the first distribution. They note that some of the extra-weight runners are actually positioned well at the front. Accordingly, their mind reels at the idea of a time penalty applied based on which half the runner was in. “How is it first group runner’s fault that someone else added weight to the second group?” they wonder.
I do understand the individualist objections, but I also don’t accept that doing nothing is the most fair approach.
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pool is not of a fixed size, and there's no evidence of women being paid a premium to fulfil a quota. Conversely, there's plenty of evidence of both individual and systematic discrimination against women candidates and women "thought leaders" in tech.
Oh wow, really? So the women in tech is a growing pool? Enough to stop companies paying premium to fulfil quotas?
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
You told me human endeavors in which "diversity" (which again, means nothing) fosters innovation. But that wasn't my question. I asked what kind of diversity fosters innovation, not what kind of innovation is fostered by diversity
To err on the side of being as polite as possible: In some grim scenarios, diversity led to certain situations that gave rise to big innovations.
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
English is the simplest Latin based language. This has nothing to do with pronunciation but not even knowing basic words. Or how to communicate. Only a small percentage of Indians speak English and most statistics on it are heavily inflated. The Indian English Education system is the same one the Japanese and Koreans use. And they don't know English. The reality is it's like if you learned Spanish in middle school to…
Pronunciation and orthography vary in many cases, not simple at all. Unless you already come from a germanic language, then it's relatively easy.
What's the relationship?
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many of them just can't speak English correctly. Only a small percentage of the individuals who speak English at a proficient level of those who do, they predominately come from very wealthy upper caste families and now you have a new problem. And well. When it comes to caste, many Indians simply believe it to not exist anymore in India because of how deeply engrained it is in their social classes they never notice i…
English is an official language over there, but it is spoken differently.
Having said that, actual conversational skills in English were lacking even in Delhi. You can throw out words and hope there's enough of a shared vocabulary to get ideas across, but the majority of people aren't fluent, or even conversational in it. I've heard the Southern part is somewhat better though, as Hindi is less pervasive, and English is used more often as a second language if you travel out of state and the likes.
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Diversity can foster innovation.
The commonly held definition of 'diversity' needs more diversity - to mean more than skin color quotas.
Re: Infosys asked HR not to hire 'Indian-origin candidates', 'women with children'
#190> and candidates aged 50 or above. Ageism is so bad they didn't even bother include the complete sentence in the headline. My main 'career goal' at the moment is find an exit path out of software development. Nothing else really matters. Its now or never.