Live data from Hacker News

Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu

341–350 of 357 posts

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#341
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Essentially, he also created NFTs then...

I think Knuth also created news.ycombinator.com, google.com, and facebook.com. He refused all google stock, however, since they implemented map-reduce incorrectly, using a set of filters. In the case of fb, he was outfoxed, because he didn't have the documents to prove that he created all the algorithms for matching faces.

Is this real?

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#342
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Knuth also created news.ycombinator.com, google.com, and facebook.com. He refused all google stock, however, since they implemented map-reduce incorrectly, using a set of filters. In the case of fb, he was outfoxed, because he didn't have the documents to prove that he created all the algorithms for matching faces.

Is this real?

There is a wonderful alternate timeline where this is true!

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#343
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Knuth also created news.ycombinator.com, google.com, and facebook.com. He refused all google stock, however, since they implemented map-reduce incorrectly, using a set of filters. In the case of fb, he was outfoxed, because he didn't have the documents to prove that he created all the algorithms for matching faces.

Is this real?

> He refused all google stock, however, since they implemented map-reduce incorrectly, using a set of filters.

That was a reference to google filtering their presented results instead of being driven more by search results, as they advertise that they are.

> In the case of fb, he was outfoxed, because he didn't have the documents to prove that he created all the algorithms for matching faces.

That sentence was a nod to the accusations against Zuckerberg for stealing the original code for FB.

Of course, this was all presented in the context of the prodigiously productive Donald Knuth for your reading enjoyment. In this way, the comment was meant to show though tongue-in-cheek how great Knuth is for Comp-Sci. It was not an attempt to drag any company through the mud. That happens without me.

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#344
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been randomly skipping around inside these books for a long, long time. They're full of little gems that you won't find elsewhere. For example, in Volume 4A there's a simple technique for comparing two pointers in bit-reversed form. This technique was patented by Hewlett-Packard as a method of randomizing search trees (treaps): https://bugfix-66.com/fdb8bb4fa84cf810aa25ff40c88a13c1874410... From Volume 3, here i…

I'm somehow on that list twice, which looks like a bug. I wonder if there is a reward for finding an error in the reward list.

He fixed the issue quickly after I sent an email.

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#345
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe Brandon Sanderson can write the last three books.

Never heard of him, is he another great computer scientist? I'd love it if someone like Chris Wellons or Per Bothner could work on them, but filling Knuth's shoes may be a big task for one man.

I'm flattered, but have no idea where that came from. While I have implemented some interesting data structures and algorithms in my time, I don't consider myself a "Computer Scientist" or algorithms expert. However, I did work with Knuth in the 1980s, and am in a group photo in his "Digital Typography" book. I agree with all the nice things people have said about him.

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish modern OS could keep up with my typing and window switching and app launching and ... I'm constantly perturbed and interrupted when some app window just 'hangs' for a few seconds (some garbage collection going on, probably?). I can't pinpoint any one thing, just... everything seems relatively slow in 2022 compared to, even 10 years ago, and certainly 20. Applications weren't always phoning home to check things…

Latency is the worst thing when operating any machinery. I don't know why people tolerate it so much with computers. It's one of the most important things for me when using any software. That's why a long time ago I settled on using tools like emacs, git, i3/sway etc. When I try trendy tools like VSCode etc. I can't believe the latency people put up with.

> vario 1 day ago | flag| favorite | root | parent | prev | next [–] [collapse root]

VSCode has a pretty bad latency problem, and it's the reason I stay away and use Notepad++ or VS2022. Sublime if on Mac.

I use git on the command line. My largest bitch is when it says "invalid command. you typed 'statsu', the closest command to this is 'status'"

Kill me now - it's a non-destructive command, and you KNOW what I was trying to say!

Those mishaps don't happen in IDEs.

Re: Knuth's Art of Computer Programming, V 4B, has gone into print

#350
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google and Youtube often think I am a robot because of how fast I operate on their sites: typing, clicking, switching tabs etc..

I wish modern OS could keep up with my typing and window switching and app launching and ... I'm constantly perturbed and interrupted when some app window just 'hangs' for a few seconds (some garbage collection going on, probably?). I can't pinpoint any one thing, just... everything seems relatively slow in 2022 compared to, even 10 years ago, and certainly 20. Applications weren't always phoning home to check things…

Preach it - my inability to figure out or control why the UI decides it's time to ignore what I'm typing in realtime while it's trying to back up a file (or whatever) is the cause of so many frustrations
Post reply on HN