Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you have enough followers, what prevents you from harassing another user anyway? Crowdsourced, targeted harassment already happens all the time. This seems like it would just be a more convoluted and troublesome means to an already available end.
But this would be like putting an official “sanctioned by Twitter” badge on that harassment.
All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
21–30 of 97 posts
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#22I was recently invited to be a lead on Nextdoor (I know, I know) and accepted so that I could peek behind the curtain. Their process is that any flagged content is voted on by leads to Leave it, Possibly Remove, or Remove. What I've observed is that posts that completely break the rules still have a 50/50 split. My point being that many people are not able to objectively look at something and make a decision. Their o…
Not sure if it helped kill it or if that was incidental.
The "rules" always have interpretations and most people don't steelman posts that disagree with them.
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#23If I had enough followers and was part of this program what prevents me from harassing another user via notes and getting my followers to mark my note as helpful?
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#24This is not how facts work, JFC.
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#25Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#26I was recently invited to be a lead on Nextdoor (I know, I know) and accepted so that I could peek behind the curtain. Their process is that any flagged content is voted on by leads to Leave it, Possibly Remove, or Remove. What I've observed is that posts that completely break the rules still have a 50/50 split. My point being that many people are not able to objectively look at something and make a decision. Their o…
Slashdot had moderation and metamoderation and it worked ... for awhile. Part of the reason was you could still browse at -1 if you wanted to, so there were chances for things that got "attacked" to bubble back up. Not sure if it helped kill it or if that was incidental. The "rules" always have interpretations and most people don't steelman posts that disagree with them.
Past tense because I mostly stopped going to slashdot when cmdrtaco left. I don't really know how the moderation has been going since then.
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#27And how exactly does the general public know whether something is true in order to vote on it?
If they knew it was false this wouldn't be an issue to begin with...
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#28Wow crowdsourcing truth that's super great. I see no problems at all with this. It's not like angry partisans on one side would create and push fake stories and news about another horrible atrocity that person of an unpopular group that would lead to mass violence and genocide. Nothing like that has ever happenned with social media tools in countries like Mynamar. I for one am worried though about what if bad people…
Re: All Twitter users in the US will start to see crowdsourced fact checks on tweets
#29The note on the tweet had the additional context that it was temporary and there was a bus substitute. The takeaway is completely different with this context. I appreciated it.