>
This is a question I have never seen these inflation hawks answer: If printing money triggers inflation, why is there a 14 year lag on that effect?The argument I've heard, though am not well enough equipped to fully analyze, is that the created money was going into overseas accounts as various nations tried to accumulate the global reserve currency - dollars - to purchase oil and other products that were generally traded in dollars. As long as that remained the case, an awful lot of dollars could be printed, spent, and ended up squirreled away elsewhere not really having an impact (velocity of money and such).
Now, though, that arrangement is ending - in no part due to the US abusing our financial system to control what everyone else can or can't do (see Visa's opinions about what industries they'll serve for an example, also SWIFT, global sanctions, etc). So other countries are making other arrangements that don't involve dollars - I'm pretty certain dollars aren't involved in the Russian oil sales to various other countries in their sphere anymore. And any reasonable country that isn't heavily tied to the US has to be figuring out how to move off dollars.
So now those all come home to roost, and combined with the lack of things to buy, we see the nasty inflation we're getting.
I'm not certain how well it holds up if you really dig into it, but there are certainly people answering your question if you actually go looking for how it's being answered.