Earlier quoted context omitted.
Calling spyware an "imagined hypothetical" re Microsoft is like calling "too hot coffee" an "imagined hypothetical" for McDonalds. They've already done it a bunch. Are you naive enough to 100% believe their pinky swears?
Sure, let’s have any example of this by any reputable news source then.
https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
gnu.org not reputable? Hey, no worries, it's an ENORMOUS ANNOTATED list. Have fun.