another site that unnecessary wants me to sign up.
Is it unnecessary, or did they save spending money on your instance of an AI when you probably weren't going to pay them anyway?
Character.ai
11–20 of 142 posts
Re: Character.ai
#12another site that unnecessary wants me to sign up.
Re: Character.ai
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it unnecessary, or did they save spending money on your instance of an AI when you probably weren't going to pay them anyway?
The "haha, I prevented the adoption of my product and therefore saved a bunch of money!" business model.
Re: Character.ai
#14another site that unnecessary wants me to sign up.
Is it unnecessary, or did they save spending money on your instance of an AI when you probably weren't going to pay them anyway?
I have no clue what to expect, so it's hard to know if I could even be a customer. I thought I might be, but I am not gonna sign up to find out.
Re: Character.ai
#15Re: Character.ai
#16Just think what the difference is between interactive learning via a teacher and book-learning. With a teacher, you can ask for questions, ask for elaboration, and discover new terms and concepts you don't know you don't know.
This is possible with this tool. Asking the right questions leads to terms and concept you may not have heard, which you can then explore. This needs to be hooked up to a 3D avatar and voice synthesis, with microphone & camera access.
I can really see this technology, in a more refined state, as a potential future of education. Really exciting.
Re: Character.ai
#17I'm surprised, I haven't actually encountered any issues yet after talking to 3 different bots. Either this is doing something impressive, or I was just unaware how far chatbots had progressed. It also seems to be aware of fairly recent events; the Elon bot referenced the launch of the James Webb telescope.
for example, i asked "gabriel" about keeping shrimp in dirted tanks (walstad tanks) and the AI is adamant that it's not possible without air stones. also "... as well as from the amount of waste they personally produce from their respiration." (the waste they refer to isn't from respiration). all in all, tho, it's pretty close.
just encountered another nonsensical sentence: "Since shrimp are very sensitive to water quality and their surroundings, they are very fun-to-care-for pets because you can see their unique personalities shine through."
Re: Character.ai
#18another site that unnecessary wants me to sign up.
Is it unnecessary, or did they save spending money on your instance of an AI when you probably weren't going to pay them anyway?
Re: Character.ai
#19A lot of the technical questions I asked were just … not answered correctly, beyond surface level stuff like "What is …". There's nuance and abstractions the AI doesn't understand, while sounding very authoritative when answering.
Re: Character.ai
#20I'm surprised, I haven't actually encountered any issues yet after talking to 3 different bots. Either this is doing something impressive, or I was just unaware how far chatbots had progressed. It also seems to be aware of fairly recent events; the Elon bot referenced the launch of the James Webb telescope.
Maybe GPT was already better than I realized. Or it's something different that I haven't heard about.