A CTO should be technical
141–150 of 367 posts
Re: A CTO should be technical
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Transparency is not your job. > You're job is to keep telling your reports that everything is on track no matter what > This will 100% require lying or being non-transparent at some point. Following this advice is another way of loosing employees, at least I'd leave a company quickly if the CTO started lying about potential problems not being problems. In the end, depends on the company. Usually the company I've wo…
>all will be good when we release Well I've literally been in the position where this was true to close a deal so we could stay in business. What would be the best option in your opinion? Risk a critical person leaving right then and loosing the customer and then losing everyone job? Or lying and telling them we are all ok just keep on doing your job and don't listen to rumors? You are espousing false virtue/armchair…
I'd rather my job disappear than still be there because someone with employment power over me lied to me. This isn't false virtue or armchair anything. No exceptions, or I don't work with you ever again. It's not hard. Learn to communicate effectively, and learn to treat your employees with the respect they deserve.
Re: A CTO should be technical
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My second CTO was very technical an up to date the first wasn’t. The only difference between the two day to day was with the second one , I could use terms without defining them first. They both deferred to my technical judgement and I worked with the understanding of how to align my initiatives with the company’s. > I work with CxOs all the time in consulting now. I have no problem getting my ideas through CxOs or…
> But a technical CTO can stand up to reports that want to go down an obviously bad road, whereas a non-technical CTO would have as much defense as I would at jiffy lube when the tech asks me if I want my fluids flushed. It kind of sounds like a scam, but I really don't know. Very true. GP probably had good tech judgement which is why their technical CTO was following their judgement.
I told myself that there were only two positions at two companies that could have convinced me to leave. I got hired by one of those companies. He left less than a year later after the company was acquired for 10x revenue. He’s working somewhere else now. I would work for him again in a heartbeat if I were working anywhere else besides where I work now.
Re: A CTO should be technical
#144Should a conductor know how to play instruments? Of course not, but it's imperative they know physical realities of playing each one. That's a key component of understanding where the orchestra is at and where you can take it. Is that technical? I'd argue it is.
I was very surprised to read that someone would think this, so I thought I'd check whether it's true. Here are some recentish famous conductors selected from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conducting; though I didn't make an effort to select very randomly, this ought to include most of the most famous conductors:
- Herbert von Karajan: child prodigy at the piano, continued studying piano into his 20s, no notes on whether he continued playing in later life or took up more instruments
- Marin Alsop: studied violin at Juillard, played violin in the New York Philharmonic and the New York City Ballet, no word on whether she still plays today
- Simone Young: studied piano at the Sydney Conservatorium, played piano as a répétiteuse at Opera Australia, no word on whether she still plays today
- Alondra de la Parra: began studying piano at 7 and the cello at 13, studied piano (and conducting) at the Manhattan School of Music, received BM in piano, no word on whether she still plays today
- Seiji Ozawa: began studying piano at 9, studied piano at the Toho Gakuen School of Music under Saito until he broke his fingers and couldn't play anymore, consequently switching to conducting, no word on whether he's taken up other instruments today
- Myung-whun Chung: won "joint second-prize in the 1974 International Tchaikovsky Competition" as a pianist, still famous as a pianist today as well as a conductor
- Henry Jay Lewis: child prodigy on various instruments starting at 5, famous as a double-bassist as well as a conductor, "first African-American instrumentalist in a major symphony orchestra" as a double-bassist
- Charles Dean Dixon: no information about whether he knew how to play any instruments. However, the New York Public Library summary of the Dean Dixon papers https://archives.nypl.org/scm/21001 says, "Dixon began studying violin at the age of 1 or 2, and played most of the instruments that comprise an orchestra."
- James DePreist: played percussion in a jazz quintet, was sponsored by the State Department at age 36 to tour "the Near and the Far East with DePreist lecturing and performing jazz," when he got his first chance to conduct an orchestra, in Bangkok. Contracted polio on the tour. Published two books of poetry. No word on whether he continued to play instruments for the rest of his life.
- Paul Douglas Freeman: no word in Wikipedia on his instrument-playing abilities, but https://www.chicagosinfonietta.org/wp-content/uploads/Paul-F... says, 'Music lessons were also a required routine when the Freeman siblings grew old enough to
handle them; Freeman started piano lessons at age five, and he soon took up the clarinet as
well. He took clarinet lessons at Richmond's Armstrong High School while still in elementary
school and took lessons at Virginia State College in Petersburg while in high school. His
conducting debut came at age 14 or 15, when his clarinet teacher fell ill and was unable to
conduct the Armstrong school band for its scheduled performance at a PTA meeting. Freeman
stepped in as a substitute. "Although the ministry was an earlier career interest, a maestro was
born that evening," Freeman wrote in a letter quoted in the book Black Conductors.
Freeman soon added the cello to his instrumental arsenal, and his teachers started urging him
to consider a career in music.' And https://www.thehistorymakers.org/biography/paul-douglas-free... says, 'Freeman attended the Eastman School of Music, where he earned his B.A., M.A. and Ph.D. degrees, with his principal instruments being the clarinet and the cello,' explaining that his conducting career began after that.
- Michael DeVard Morgan: began playing piano at age 8, was conducting two orchestras by age 12; performed chamber music on piano in the "Chamber Music Alive" series in Sacramento, California.
- Arthur Nikisch, "one of the founders of modern conducting": studied at the Vienna Conservatory, winning prizes for "composition and performance on violin and piano". Worked as a violinist in the Vienna Philharmonic.
- Fritz Reiner: studied piano under Bela Bartok, no word on whether he continued playing in later life or took up other instruments.
- Arturo Toscanini: studied the cello on a scholarship at the local conservatory, toured South America in the orchestra of an opera company and had his first conducting experience when the players went on strike against the previous conductor; continued playing cello, including in the world premiere of a Verdi opera, until "Toscanini's reputation as an operatic conductor of unusual authority and skill supplanted his cello career".
- Wilhelm Furtwängler: no word in the Wikipedia article about his talents as an instrumentalist, but https://www.gramophone.co.uk/features/article/wilhelm-furtwa... says he was "also a very capable pianist", http://patangel.free.fr/furt/bio_en.htm says he started studying piano at 7 and played piano in the Lübeck orchestra and the Vienna Philharmonic (in which case he was also conducting). http://www.scena.org/lsm/sm3-5/sm3-5furtwangler.htm says his piano studies began at 4.
- Leopold Stokowski: sang in the choir, elected to membership in the Royal College of Organists at age 16, "appointed the organist and choir director of St. James's Church" at age 20, then "began work in New York City as the organist and choir director of St. Bartholomew's Church", and did not begin conducting until age 27. No word on whether he played instruments in later life (presumably he did not have his own pipe organ.)
- Otto Klemperer: no word in the Wikipedia article on playing instruments, but https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/literature-and-arts/musi... and the more-reliable-appearing https://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Klemperer-Otto.htm say he studied piano at the Hochschule fuer Musik in Frankfurt and in Berlin. http://web.archive.org/web/20090502025309/http://www.klemper... says, "The teen-aged Klemperer soon established himself as a pianist of note, performing Beethoven's Sonata in D major in a conservatory concert and serving as accompanist to the celebrated baritone Julius Stockhausen," and explains the move to Berlin by explaining that he was following his piano teacher James Kwast, who had moved to the Klindworth-Scharwenka Conservatory and then the Stern Conservatory, and that Mahler recommended him as an "outstanding musician" on the strength of his piano performances as well as his conducting. No word on whether he continued playing piano in later life.
- Leonard Bernstein: taught himself piano at age 10, played piano at the New England Conservatory and the Boston Public School Orchestra, accompanist for the Harvard Glee Club, studied piano at the Curtis Institute of Music, played jazz piano at the Village Vanguard, noted as an adult as a pianist, surprised Aaron Copland by playing Copland's Piano Variations at his birthday party, "often conducted piano concertos from the keyboard".
So, after looking long and hard, reading through the biographies of 18 different famous conductors, I was unable to find even one great conductor who didn't know how to play instruments. Most of them were in fact very talented instrumentalists; a few were world-famous as instrumentalists. Most of them dedicated many years of their lives to learning to play instruments. The only one I could find that didn't have a paid music career playing instruments, as well as conducting, was Seiji Ozawa, and that was because his piano career was cut short by a crippling hand injury. (And I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Ozawa played horn or something in his spare time, even if he didn't perform publicly.)
Re: A CTO should be technical
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've been designing microprocessors for 20 years? By yourself, or do you mean that you're contributing to your team's microprocessor design? Were you sending out your own processor designs to MOSIS or CMP or something 20 years ago, or was this more an FPGA thing?
Oh no.. the microprocessor stuff is purely a technical hobby, although it was what I specialized in undergrad EE, and I worked at Intel for 3 years right out of college. I have done FPGA designs, simulated designs in HDLs, and even a few really cool 74X digital logic based designs and implementations... and so many on paper experiments during occasional long boring meetings. The interesting aspect of doing microproce…
Re: A CTO should be technical
#146I just became a CTO. So, let me bear my thoughts. Since July of this year I've been CTO for a small games company, I've worked in this industry before in a more specialised role but this is much broader scope. I've gone from being responsible for 1 person to 10 which will likely become 50 by the end of next year. I'm terrified. I'm terrified because I feel like I will let my reports down. I'm terrified because a lot…
I was a CTO once. Transparency is not your job. You're job is to keep telling your reports that everything is on track no matter what everything else is just "rumors". If you don't they will start getting anxiety or looking for new jobs instead of pressing on. This could actually be the difference between what makes things fail or succeed. You're job is not to be transparent or honest. Its to make sure everyone stays…
Once you peek behind the curtain of where your firm's cash comes from and where it goes, you have to live with a deep existential fear that you could mess up a bunch of people's lives... and you don't want others to have to live with that.
Re: A CTO should be technical
#147I just became a CTO. So, let me bear my thoughts. Since July of this year I've been CTO for a small games company, I've worked in this industry before in a more specialised role but this is much broader scope. I've gone from being responsible for 1 person to 10 which will likely become 50 by the end of next year. I'm terrified. I'm terrified because I feel like I will let my reports down. I'm terrified because a lot…
I was a CTO once. Transparency is not your job. You're job is to keep telling your reports that everything is on track no matter what everything else is just "rumors". If you don't they will start getting anxiety or looking for new jobs instead of pressing on. This could actually be the difference between what makes things fail or succeed. You're job is not to be transparent or honest. Its to make sure everyone stays…
Re: A CTO should be technical
#148Re: A CTO should be technical
#149Re: A CTO should be technical
#150I'm going to put this out on a limb - CEOs should also be technical.