On Adobe acquiring Figma
51–60 of 83 posts
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#52This rings so true.. ..even with Adobe keeping Figma as independent as it can be, it will develop and grow at a much slower pace since there will be no venture capital funds pouring in, and Adobe’s resources drained to pay off the acquisition cost. The only winner is Figma investors. This acquisition is a lose-lose-lose situation for Adobe, Figma, and the design community.
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#53> Who is David Wadhwani, the person Figma is going to report to? (...) A little further research shows he joined Adobe in June 2021, just over a year ago. His last position prior was Venture Partner at venture capital firm Greylock. (...) Greylock invested in Figma in Series A, B, C, D, and E! Figma Series A’s price was $0.2 per share; it 200x’ed at the acquisition deal. Even if he didn't personally invest in Figma,…
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#54Regarding the justifications for Figma's price: > most startups cut their valuation by a lot in 2022 Most startups are not used by every single other startup, whereas I would be very surprised if any startup doesn't use Figma for UI design. I've never used Canva and never heard a company using it. The only time I heard of Canva is to create a nice looking CV. Comparing outliers to the average/most isn't very helpful.…
>whereas I would be very surprised if any startup doesn't use Figma for UI design. have startups stopped using Invision? >acquirers desperation (very high), I would think acquirers desperation (very high) would be another word for 'dump this stock' which to me is what the article seems really about. People dumped adobe, why because Figma not worth that unless acquirers desperation (very high). uh oh, who wants to hol…
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe the author should've opened David Wadhwani LinkedIn profile instead of just linking to it. He worked for Adobe for 13 years until 2015 and rejoined in 2021. PS: not defending the purchase or Adobe but this statement in the article is factually wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The author's main point is he worked at Greylock before Adobe - factually accurate. Also accurate - conflict of interest if he in anyway was part of acquisition efforts.
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#56I recognize that inflation is quickly destroying the value of the dollar, but $20 billion is still a mind numbingly large amount of money to be throwing around at the clear end of a long term tech sector growth cycle.
This speaks as a brutal admission from Adobe corporate leadership that they lack the internal entrepreneurial skills to drive the development of new and innovative products in their market space, and based on the ~10% stock price drop since the announcement I imagine the market sees it the same way.
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#57Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#58Regarding the justifications for Figma's price: > most startups cut their valuation by a lot in 2022 Most startups are not used by every single other startup, whereas I would be very surprised if any startup doesn't use Figma for UI design. I've never used Canva and never heard a company using it. The only time I heard of Canva is to create a nice looking CV. Comparing outliers to the average/most isn't very helpful.…
>whereas I would be very surprised if any startup doesn't use Figma for UI design. have startups stopped using Invision? >acquirers desperation (very high), I would think acquirers desperation (very high) would be another word for 'dump this stock' which to me is what the article seems really about. People dumped adobe, why because Figma not worth that unless acquirers desperation (very high). uh oh, who wants to hol…
Speaking as a designer, Invision has never felt like a serious design tool and they've had a constant struggle to find their place in the market. Invision started life as a prototyping tool, and they dabbled with Studio sometime around 2019, but recently they've morphed into more of a collaboration/whiteboarding tool. They're probably more akin to Miro or Jamboard than Figma these days.
Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#59Re: On Adobe acquiring Figma
#60Adobe's financial performance has been pretty outstanding. In 2015, their net income was 630 million dollars with 13,893 employees. By 2019, through steady growth they have grown their income to 2,951 million dollars with 22,634 employees. In other words, while in 2015 an employee produced 45347 dollars but in 2019 the same person produced 130739 dollars. I would be slow to presume they do not know what they are doin…
I remember that I found it strange back at the time that almost no-one was mentioning this in the tech media, all eyes were focused on the analytics businesses related to Facebook and Google.