Earlier quoted context omitted.
>There's too strong an ethos of an "ask for forgiveness, not permission" What's the alternative though? Waiting for permission could take decades while your competitors are eating your lunch.
The only winning move is not to play
Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
11–20 of 390 posts
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#12Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only winning move is not to play
The tech world shows us that the winning strategy is to just go ahead and do what you want, ideally with consistent financial backing, and pay our way out of any issues that arise.
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#14It is very easy to see hypocrisy in the FurAffinty statement: "Human artists see, analyze and even sample other artists’ work to create content. That content generated can reference hundreds, even thousands of pieces of work from other artists that they have consumed in their lifetime to create derivative images,” ... “Our goal is to support artists and their content. We don’t believe it’s in our community’s best int…
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#15Email this morning: AI Generated Content Effective immediately, Getty Images will cease to accept all submissions created using AI generative models (e.g., Stable Diffusion, Dall‑E 2, MidJourney, etc.) and prior submissions utilizing such models will be removed. There are open questions with respect to the copyright of outputs from these models and there are unaddressed rights issues with respect to the underlying im…
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#16Seems like a statement of intent without any details. How do they define 'AI-generated'? And do they plan to automatically detect it, and how?
That's probably how lawyers will put it.
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#17It is very easy to see hypocrisy in the FurAffinty statement: "Human artists see, analyze and even sample other artists’ work to create content. That content generated can reference hundreds, even thousands of pieces of work from other artists that they have consumed in their lifetime to create derivative images,” ... “Our goal is to support artists and their content. We don’t believe it’s in our community’s best int…
AI generated images have the potential to be art in the eyes of the beholder, but let's not pretend that generation is the same as the mental, physical, and spiritual flow state that goes into painting or drawing a piece.
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only winning move is not to play
The tech world shows us that the winning strategy is to just go ahead and do what you want, ideally with consistent financial backing, and pay our way out of any issues that arise.
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#19Email this morning: AI Generated Content Effective immediately, Getty Images will cease to accept all submissions created using AI generative models (e.g., Stable Diffusion, Dall‑E 2, MidJourney, etc.) and prior submissions utilizing such models will be removed. There are open questions with respect to the copyright of outputs from these models and there are unaddressed rights issues with respect to the underlying im…
Re: Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of copyright claims
#20Does Stable Diffusion and the like automatically add some kind of steganographic code to images so it can be automatically detected, e.g. and not added to future training sets? Obviously this could be removed deliberately, but it would prevent the vast majority of cases.