Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

dogbunnypuzzle.com

421–430 of 485 posts

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#422
post #415

I have to say the fact that I was able to figure out how the puzzle worked - what I was meant to do - with no instructions in about 60 seconds is a good sign. I'm also immediately kind of addicted to this....I really like it. The one thing that annoys me is that I can't see what a symbol is if the dog/bunny is on it because it's covered up. It's hard to remember when there's so many. Some transparency or slight desig…

Honest question: What kind of design change would you make? I am struggling to think of a good solution that doesn't involve making pieces smaller, which I don't want to do. One option is that a subtle version of the location image pops up next to the location space if it is occupied

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#423

Suggestion: make the dog eat the rabbit if they occupy the same space. (I solved it without doing so because I assumed that was a constraint.)

Yes, I'm thinking of working this idea into the next iteration (though with a wolf instead of a dog)

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#424
post #25

Took me a while to figure it out as I assumed the labels on the lines to be dynamic. But once I got it, it was super fun to play. I wonder if you can algorithmically generate these puzzles and have human's curate them based on factors (joy, difficulty, visual appeal etc). Thanks for sharing. :)

Yes I have a puzzle generator program, will post more soon

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#425
post #415

I have to say the fact that I was able to figure out how the puzzle worked - what I was meant to do - with no instructions in about 60 seconds is a good sign. I'm also immediately kind of addicted to this....I really like it. The one thing that annoys me is that I can't see what a symbol is if the dog/bunny is on it because it's covered up. It's hard to remember when there's so many. Some transparency or slight desig…

Honest question: What kind of design change would you make? I am struggling to think of a good solution that doesn't involve making pieces smaller, which I don't want to do. One option is that a subtle version of the location image pops up next to the location space if it is occupied

Maybe change the animal picture to have them holding the item in their mouth?

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#426
post #415

I have to say the fact that I was able to figure out how the puzzle worked - what I was meant to do - with no instructions in about 60 seconds is a good sign. I'm also immediately kind of addicted to this....I really like it. The one thing that annoys me is that I can't see what a symbol is if the dog/bunny is on it because it's covered up. It's hard to remember when there's so many. Some transparency or slight desig…

Honest question: What kind of design change would you make? I am struggling to think of a good solution that doesn't involve making pieces smaller, which I don't want to do. One option is that a subtle version of the location image pops up next to the location space if it is occupied

Being able to move all animals in the same circle.

Right now you could only move the upper one.

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#428
Good fun, but not intuitive for people who drive on the left-hand side of the road (the somebody at bone/somebody at flower path assumes right-hand drive). Occupying the same space also feels wrong - I didn't even try this until both bunnies had to go onto the carrot.

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I made the same assumption and didn't even try putting the dog and rabbits together, but I completed the puzzle (at least I'm pretty sure I didn't overlap them, there was a lot of back and forth)

I find it amusing that this is driven by the particular visualisations of the characters. I.e. if it were a chicken and a rabbit would you have also made this assumption?

If it was a chicken and rabbit I think I would have tried to overlap them

Re: Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle

#430

Good fun, but not intuitive for people who drive on the left-hand side of the road (the somebody at bone/somebody at flower path assumes right-hand drive). Occupying the same space also feels wrong - I didn't even try this until both bunnies had to go onto the carrot.

> Good fun, but not intuitive for people who drive on the left-hand side of the road (the somebody at bone/somebody at flower path assumes right-hand drive).

Both have to be occupied at the same time; it’s not directional.

Post reply on HN