Live data from Hacker News

Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

avsforum.com

31–40 of 260 posts

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#31

I have a 2020 model I bought from Costco and as slow and shitty the UI is it also still burns 16W in standby. There isn't a way to disable Chromecast either so thanks for nothing Sony and Google. I need a dumb tv and Nvidia sheild. Edit: I take the standby power usage part back. After settings changes including Eco stuff and something to do with remote start and a restart it's at 4W which is very acceptable. The UI i…

[deleted]

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#32
post #29

I have a 2020 model I bought from Costco and as slow and shitty the UI is it also still burns 16W in standby. There isn't a way to disable Chromecast either so thanks for nothing Sony and Google. I need a dumb tv and Nvidia sheild. Edit: I take the standby power usage part back. After settings changes including Eco stuff and something to do with remote start and a restart it's at 4W which is very acceptable. The UI i…

Go to Apps, “See all apps”, scroll down, find “Chromecast built-in” and then click Disable on the app’s settings. At least that is how it’s on my Sony TV.

Thanks, I am already down to 4W after Eco mode, disabling remote start and a restart -I sometimes use the Chromecast so going to leave it on.

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In which way is it becoming harder to use? The smart TV part of it?

It's simple enough to say "use an exterior device" (which I do), but even input switching is managed in software and can be a nightmare sometimes. It would be great if there was just a light OS install. It'd likely bring the power use down as well.

If you don't use live TV, consider using an external HDMI switch (or a receiver) so that the TV can stay on a single input?

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There were devices that consumed 80 watts in standby. I have a cabinet full of equipment including my cable modem, a computer (server, no monitor) with 8 mechanical hard drives. The idle current is 76 watts or so. How could something be so high?

'standby' for many devices used to mean 'leave all the electronics powered up, but turn the screen/sound off'.

the screen is the primary consumer of energy. i don’t know but imagine sound is likely more hungry in that regard than any of the other discrete systems on a smart tv.

edit: additionally tvs that don’t turn off are in some cases of limited utility.

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#35

Television isn’t my primary choice for media, but when I do I just unplug it when I’m done. 0W standby. Same for basically everything other than the refrigerator and wifi.

You don’t want to do this with an OLED TV though.

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#37
post #35

Television isn’t my primary choice for media, but when I do I just unplug it when I’m done. 0W standby. Same for basically everything other than the refrigerator and wifi.

You don’t want to do this with an OLED TV though.

I don't want to do that with anything. It's ridiculous to have to go through the trouble of doing that.

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#38
If you're wondering how much energy is consumed by your electronics, a base model kill-a-watt for about $30 will show you watts and cumulative watt-hours. It's a fantastic tool that pays for itself besides giving an eye-opening, interesting experience. You'd be surprised at the things in your house consuming electricity 24/7.

Almost everything in my house is either on power strip surge protectors or just unplugged.

Re: Sony Android TVs waste 25W in standby due to built-in Google Chromecast

#39
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's simple enough to say "use an exterior device" (which I do), but even input switching is managed in software and can be a nightmare sometimes. It would be great if there was just a light OS install. It'd likely bring the power use down as well.

If you don't use live TV, consider using an external HDMI switch (or a receiver) so that the TV can stay on a single input?

Can recommend the receiver route, at least if you also want to have a decent speaker setup (even just 2.1 stereo+sub). Receiver firmware is more more minimal and no-nonsense, plus most receivers have physical remote buttons for all inputs which makes switching faster.
Post reply on HN