Live data from Hacker News

Twilio to lay off 11% of workforce

cnbc.com

511–514 of 514 posts

Re: Twilio to lay off 11% of workforce

#511
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. I don't consider myself to have moved politically right at all, but progressives are moving drastically left. Stuff like this, and the modern gender politics that is resulting in the erasure of women and lesbians in particular, has resulted in me no longer referring to myself as a leftist.

The Republicans left me a while ago. This kinda stuff is way too left for me and I fear the Democrats are going to do the same. I’d say I’m a moderate who votes Democratic. Both sides are going too far left and right.

I would argue the 'mainstream' right is being pulled left due to its gravity, and is quite moderate these days.

Re: Twilio to lay off 11% of workforce

#512
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This creates three problems. The first is that some white people who were affected will believe it was because of their race. The second is that minorities who were not affected may be assumed to have been kept because of their minority status. But the most harmful is for minorities who were laid off. That signals that they were really subpar, even more than the average laid off person. It seems like this policy has…

But is it plain illegal. For employment purposes Race is a protected class (at least in USA) and racial discrimination while hiring or firing violates federal law. How would they get away with this?

No post body was provided.

Re: Twilio to lay off 11% of workforce

#513

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is San Francisco. When I worked there (2015-2020), most of my co-workers openly endorsed hiring bias against demographics that aren't considered "diverse". I'd be highly skeptical that a jury would side with a plaintiff alleging anti-white discrimination, no matter how solid the proof. If a community widely thinks activity that is de jure illegal should be allowed then it becomes de facto permitted because even…

I worked in SF during the same time period, at a small startup. There would have extreme fury at the idea of hiring/firing based on anything but ability. Again, this was a small company. Every person mattered. Every talented hire advanced the company, and every talented departure put us at risk. Even now at the big company I work for, the small team sizes mean each dev either contributes or drains. We even have an in…

this assumes that you’re making a lesser hire and that a parallel skill level hire of a minority isn’t possible

Re: Twilio to lay off 11% of workforce

#514

Earlier quoted context omitted.

New York state not New York City. Big difference.

Nope, same thing for NY State: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/eepc/laws/state-laws.page The parent post is just plain wrong. Race and color are protected classes, for every race and every color, not just for specific ones.

> Nope, same thing for NY State: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/eepc/laws/state-laws.page

Really? I still don't see any state law text.

> The parent post is just plain wrong. Race and color are protected classes, for every race and every color, not just for specific ones.

Didn't comment on that. Just that New York City was being used as proof of New York state.

Post reply on HN