Live data from Hacker News

CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

cpsc.gov

61–70 of 311 posts

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#61

I kind of hate that the notice points to a safety code (NFPA 70 in this case) but in order to see it, you have create an account in order to read it. If you want a copy of the code, you have to pay.

There is free-to-read-online access to the code.

You need to pay to download or get a printed copy, but the code is free (as in beer) to read.

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#63
post #45
post #29

When I read the article and it said they sell for $40-$72 my jaw dropped. You could make one of these for under $10 pretty easily. Hell if you were resourceful you could make it for free by finding someone giving away a couple plug in appliances for free and cut the cord and make it. Also I believe these cords are also sold for christmas lights if you hang them the wrong way but if used with a generator I believe the…

Rehang your christmas lights...

Of course but for many the solution is a cheap cord or hours of work taking down and rehanging lights. Many will opt for the cheap time saving solution.

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#64
post #43

How can folks not see that using such contraption is obviously a shitty idea? That’s why we need to completely overhaul the teaching of physics in middle and high school. Every citizen should have at least a basic understanding of basic physical concepts that allow then to understand why this kind of thing is a bad idea

So, I have a very good understanding of basic physics. I have a very good ability to critically think. I am, what I would consider, educated and intelligent. And there was a time in my life when I googled "double male cord" because my snow-blower has a female plug for the electric start that is supposed to go to a converter box specifically sold by the company, and I lost it and didn't want to pay $100 for a new one.…

I think that just underlines his point though, you started going down that path and then had the ability pause and think critically for a moment.

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#65

I kind of hate that the notice points to a safety code (NFPA 70 in this case) but in order to see it, you have create an account in order to read it. If you want a copy of the code, you have to pay.

Google brings up a few PDFs, dunno if they're the correct ones: https://www.google.com/search?q=NFPA%2070%20filetype%3Apdf

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#67
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you sure that Lowes can't sell heated shower heads? Maybe they choose not to sell them for liability reasons.

Don't pretend that "liability reasons" is due to ethical concerns about the safety of the product. Someone would buy it off a shelf at Lowes, would take Lowes to court, and Lowes would lose. It wouldn't be profitable. Conversely, if someone bought a dodgy product from a drop-shipper listing on Amazon and got hurt by it, do you think that Amazon would be successfully sued? Empirically, that happens but they're still p…

> Don't pretend that "liability reasons" is due to ethical concerns about the safety of the product. Someone would buy it off a shelf at Lowes, would take Lowes to court, and Lowes would lose.

Is this not exactly what “liability reasons” implies? Surely if it was an ethical argument they would’ve written “ethical reasons” instead.

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#68
post #35

I recall a holocaust among hand crafted toys, a few years ago: They were enforcing "materiel origin" labeling or something and you couldn't sell home made toys without a lot of paperwork to certify they were lead free. Amazon is too big for laws to apply, and its umbrella apparently covers foreign sellers on its platform. Another fun toy they sell is the "heated shower heads", a tankless water heater element integrat…

Amazon is the magic law blanket. They take the payment, they store the goods, they ship the wares.. but it's WAGANFU brand that they have no serviceable address for that is responsible?

Gotta love limited liability! I believe American Express was one of the last public companies to convert from unlimited liability to limited.

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#69
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you sure that Lowes can't sell heated shower heads? Maybe they choose not to sell them for liability reasons.

Don't pretend that "liability reasons" is due to ethical concerns about the safety of the product. Someone would buy it off a shelf at Lowes, would take Lowes to court, and Lowes would lose. It wouldn't be profitable. Conversely, if someone bought a dodgy product from a drop-shipper listing on Amazon and got hurt by it, do you think that Amazon would be successfully sued? Empirically, that happens but they're still p…

> Don't pretend that "liability reasons" is due to ethical concerns about the safety of the product.

Your view point is "the only reason any business might not want to electrocute people is because they've decided it won't be profitable after wrongful death suits"?

Presumably you work for a business. Would you electrocute people if you determined it would be profitable after wrongful death suits?

Re: CPSC warns consumers to stop using male-to-male extension cords sold on Amazon

#70

How can folks not see that using such contraption is obviously a shitty idea? That’s why we need to completely overhaul the teaching of physics in middle and high school. Every citizen should have at least a basic understanding of basic physical concepts that allow then to understand why this kind of thing is a bad idea

[deleted]
Post reply on HN