Live data from Hacker News

Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

rollingstone.com

1–10 of 407 posts

Re: Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

#2
I was just talking to an author who published an ad on Facebook for their sci fi book. They had the word "beat" in the ad. The FB algo said that words intills people to violence, banned her account for 2 months, and kept all the ad money.

Funny enough, her book is about the dangers of an algorithm-based AI supersystem...

Facebook is the worst.

Re: Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

#3
We really need to stop thinking about social networking sites as private companies, and think about them as the public spaces they actually are. It isn't good for society for a few companies to have a strangle hold on what can be said online.

I do kind of feel for them in some ways because you have different nations with different norms and laws, but the answer isn't some lowest common denominator, and ridding the web of anything, anyone may find objectionable.

Re: Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

#5
post #2

I was just talking to an author who published an ad on Facebook for their sci fi book. They had the word "beat" in the ad. The FB algo said that words intills people to violence, banned her account for 2 months, and kept all the ad money. Funny enough, her book is about the dangers of an algorithm-based AI supersystem... Facebook is the worst.

How come they get to keep money for the service not provided? Should be strictly illegal.

Re: Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

#7
post #5
post #2

I was just talking to an author who published an ad on Facebook for their sci fi book. They had the word "beat" in the ad. The FB algo said that words intills people to violence, banned her account for 2 months, and kept all the ad money. Funny enough, her book is about the dangers of an algorithm-based AI supersystem... Facebook is the worst.

How come they get to keep money for the service not provided? Should be strictly illegal.

It probably is, but not all jurisdictions have a small claims court and even those that do, it can be quite cumbersome compared to the lost money

Re: Facebook bans Holocaust film for violating race policy

#8
post #5
post #2

I was just talking to an author who published an ad on Facebook for their sci fi book. They had the word "beat" in the ad. The FB algo said that words intills people to violence, banned her account for 2 months, and kept all the ad money. Funny enough, her book is about the dangers of an algorithm-based AI supersystem... Facebook is the worst.

How come they get to keep money for the service not provided? Should be strictly illegal.

You can probably go to arbitration, which you agreed to. This is what companies often require in their terms of service. It's going to be costly for one of the parties.
Post reply on HN