Live data from Hacker News

Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

discord.com

211–220 of 234 posts

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#211
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Their privacy policy (and practices) is awful. Like?

I am curious about this as well. We take privacy very seriously at Discord. Earlier this year, we entirely re-wrote our privacy policy as well to be more plain English and less legalese. I think that it's actually one of the more well written privacy policies out there.

>We take privacy very seriously at Discord.

You don't even have something as basic as adjustable message retention. You host your service on Google Cloud and AFAIK, you don't use E2E for anything, not even direct messages.

Your privacy policy includes the following clause:

  We may share information if needed to enforce our Terms of Service, Community Guidelines, or other policies, or to protect the rights, property, and safety of ourselves and others.
Which, as anyone semi-aware will realize, is generic enough to allow for sharing anything with anyone.

Oh, and according to the same privacy policy you retain deleted account information for at least two years by default. Anything else requires the user to "submit an ID for an age verification appeal". That's telling in its own right.

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Discords notifications are actually are nightmare. I still have a single (1) on my direct messages link and I cannot figure out (since like 2 month) where it comes from. And that all after I had a little red dot in the taskbar discord icon for like a year which I somehow managed to get rid of. Overall its usability is okay for me, but there are really some big quirks.

> I still have a single (1) on my direct messages link and I cannot figure out Maybe it's a friend request? > And that all after I had a little red dot in the taskbar discord icon for like a year which I somehow managed to get rid of. This is the most annoying thing. I think it means you have "some" unread messages. A single message in any of the 100s of channels in a dozen "servers" you're in will trigger that with…

> Maybe it's a friend request?

Just tried that - nope. It actually was the "Nitro - 1 Month FREE" tab below "Friends".

Never tried that before...

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#214
post #59
post #3

Are they searchable and indexable? What made PHPBB and all that cool was that it'd turn up in search queries. As a hobbyist, this was an incredible wealth of information for me that has mostly dried up with the advent of walled gardens like slack, discord, etc. Some might point at BBS and IRC and say that those were the same, but I'd argue that they had lower volume, and less rich media, and I'd go one further to say…

On the modern internet, I don't know that being searchable and indexed is always a benefit. I like the idea of a semi-private space. I don't want people on the internet to be able to drudge up out of context statements I made 10 years ago by googling "site:discord.com ". I can tell a lot of people are the same way just by their behavior; the discussion that happens on Discord is a lot different than anything on, say,…

> On the modern internet, I don't know that being searchable and indexed is always a benefit.

Not everything has to be so, but the things we cant search & find on the internet are of vastly less value to humanity. Being isolated apart & alone has some advantages, but endurance visibility maintenance & use is an incomparable advantage that is hot & trendy to take & counter on.

All in all the cases of most of us getting found & wrecked for past shit has been enormously vastly overblown, especially for not-obviously-shitty takes (which i definitely think we need to create permission & space to allow & amemd over time!!! without going full fuck-off turtle mode to greater reality). Anti-democracy fearmongering- the fear to speak (and the fear of more fearmongers using out-of-context low-brow anti-signalling-polarization-ammunition)- like most fears- sells, gets those eyeballs, captivates our imagination & holds our horror-sense. But what an overblown sad conservatism, what a unforunate & sad retinence to have tacits socially let in the door of our collective mind, so rarely a real issue.

The thing about reddit and facebook is they are fundamentally stream based systems. Whats at the top is tied deeply to freshness, anything else falls off. Judging so shortly, saying they are deficient may be perhaps true, but this structurality seems like the cause for war to me, not the public-ness of these mediums.

Alternative ways of collecting & gathering for longer term is exactly what we need. To me the participatory versus private debate is largely orthogonal. There's some influence yes. Leave it to the users I say; lets see which communities thrive in private versus which figure out how to tap the public world to see & let's revisit in a dozen years, see whose gotten world.

Just my own voice, here (in public, on a short temporal horizon site), but: a discord that keeps itself private, exclusive, denies the world & never ever grows the capability to permit real public engagement... is an abhorrent aborational monster deserving quick fate (or to adapt & make a public conscious possible).

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#216
post #71

My OSS Project (Lit - at https://lit.dev ) just moved our community chat from Slack to Discord[1] and we couldn't be happier right now. one of the main reasons is the velocity that Discord is moving to add useful community oriented features like this. Assuming this means that Forum Channels are GA now, we're going to us them for our #ask-for-help channel to make them more organized and searchable. I think it's a grea…

The velocity????? Discord’s product has barely changed, they move so slow, but thanks to their market dominance no one has been able to compete

They just replaced the Android app with a react native monstrosity so slow I can read a page while it loads a conversation.

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#218
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does GitHub discussions fill those requirements reasonably? https://docs.github.com/en/discussions An example of this - https://github.com/nodejs/node/discussions

Github for some reason disables search engine indexing of wikis, not sure about discussions.

The problem that they have (and other user content created sites) if indexing was on is that SEO spammers use it to dump lots of links to sites.

That you don't see this is an indication that it works and dissuading those spammers.

Consider all the nearly forgotten repos out there that you occasionally stumble over and that there are no "work from home and get $30/hour - click here" or a dozen forms of "somespam.example.com" links peppering it.

Compare that with the old Wordpress blogs out there that haven't disabled comments and yet still have search indexing (or not, but spammers don't always dig far enough to see if there's a nofollow attribute on links).

So, for the most part, GitHub isn't indexed by search engines - and its across the board for the entirety of the site. Spammers realize that it is pointless to attempt in any of the forms that they could on other user created content sites and so expend no effort at all to post spam links.

Github discussions is searchable within GitHub in that repo. For example https://github.com/laravel/framework/discussions?discussions...

The wiki is fairly useful - and again, if you are searching for content in GitHub you can search wikis ( https://docs.github.com/en/search-github/searching-on-github... ) and get only content within GitHub (without having to sift through Google search results) with arguably a more powerful query language than Google's search bar ( https://docs.github.com/en/search-github/getting-started-wit... )

Personally, if I am looking for content for a FOSS that is hosted on GitHub I use GitHub's search for discussions and wikis first before trying to search for content in google.

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#219
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does GitHub discussions fill those requirements reasonably? https://docs.github.com/en/discussions An example of this - https://github.com/nodejs/node/discussions

Github discussions scale quite poorly if you have hundreds or thousands posts each day. Also, for nonprogrammers Github is a really alien place. And it is still proprietary lock-in. But yes, it can be a viable alternative and at least is not asking phone number for read only access.

The discussions scale is a problem of you need people specifically triage and moderate the content. For large projects, I'll grand that this could scale poorly but for preserving information and discussions, it remains better than other options.

And yes, GitHub isn't the proper spot for non-programmers. All the workflows around it are geared to hosting a software or at least a site.

The proprietary lock-in... I don't agree with in that if that is an issue, then discord is too (and likely more). GitHub exposes the information for discussions quite easily - https://docs.github.com/en/graphql/guides/using-the-graphql-... I would be willing to take the stance that any forum that you don't host and access the underlying data without needing to go through the user facing application is lock in. With GitHub discussions, the access to the underlying data is more available than any other forum that you don't host yourself.

FWIW, from my work machine I access GitHub without issue. I can't access discord and will likely be unable to persuade such a change up the chain as Discord is largely seen as primarily chat for non-professional activities.

Re: Forum Channels: A space for organized conversations

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Their privacy policy (and practices) is awful. Like?

https://reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/rsxeee/you_should_neve...

> There is no way the freemium nitro barriers keep discord from going under, Discord's entire hope is that eventually it will be bought out by a tech giant

And yet they have not been purchased yet.

> Discord collects everything you do inside

Make a post on HN saying "disable newrelic if you value user privacy" and see how well that goes.

> Things tracked outside the program include : programs you run and other system specific information that can identify your hardware (such as your HWID's)

Discord does not collect the programs you run on their server. It does scan for them to enable the game tracking feature. See the post by u/GlenMerlin:

> Logging your opened apps is an optional setting (mostly done to detect discord rich presence for games, so your friends can see you're playing halo infinite and join with one click) and you can turn it off and the data is stored locally.

> All it takes is 1 breach to make every message you ever sent public information.

I can assure you extracting any sizable fraction of Discord's messages will incur at least a few hundred petabytes of data transfer fees within a day, triggering DLP alerts or maybe even regular billing "unnatural increase in data transfer costs" alerts. Even if Discord were hacked, their infrastructure makes actually downloading user data both infeasible and riskier than just dumping the user DB containing emails and hashed passwords. To add, that's just for data stored on the server - the actual "science" api containing things like how you use Discord likely accumulates hundreds of petabytes worth of data a month on its own, it'd be easier to download the generated user behavior reports than to download the data itself.

The E2E criticism is valid but users obviously don't care enough to move off of Discord, even with the privacy campaigns against them and efforts to move communities over to Guilded.

Post reply on HN