The UX of Porn Tube Sites Are Designed for the Ultimate Money Shot

Post by cwillu » Wed, Sep 14, 2022, 4:55 PM UTC

toast0 wrote: post #86

yodon wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AGPL Section 13 as you quote it discussed the interaction of AGPL and GPL v3. It has nothing to do with the scenario the parent commenter was discussing involving the interaction of AGPL and closed-source non-GPL code.

Well, does that allow you to have the rest of your backend GPL licensed and simply not distributed? Nobody has a right to see the code unless they have the executable, and you're not giving anyone the executable, so... Kind of unfortunate if there's a leak though.

Post by astrange » Wed, Sep 14, 2022, 5:01 PM UTC

numpad0 wrote: post #96

thomastjeffery wrote: post #67

The worst thing about data driven UX - especially with porn - is that it's often a self fulfilling prophecy. Trends that are likely side-effects are considered to be primary factors driving engagement. With porn, it's usually a fetish that is only moderately popular, but broadly unoffensive. Because the average person who isn't specifically interested in the fetish isn't turned off by it either, that fetish gets more…

Just a guess but: I suspect a bit that foot thing might be to lower fractions of NSFW parts in an image for otherwise SFW websites(e.g. Twitter), and also to appease older demographic because it is often argued that fetish move downwards as people ages. "Step sibling" is just a successor to "teen" and "schoolgirl" for ban avoidance. There are chances that a successor will appear in 3-5 years and my instinct says it c…

Post by numpad0 » Wed, Sep 14, 2022, 5:02 PM UTC

vbezhenar wrote: post #45

wodenokoto wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maximize utility. Maximize search accuracy. Give people what they want rather than string them along for as much time as possible.

So they'll spend next 30 seconds and close your website? Not good for ad profits. Ideally they should spend 10 minutes searching for something, looking at ads, then finally find it and return to this website next day.

Post by sbf501 » Wed, Sep 14, 2022, 5:03 PM UTC

jason-phillips wrote: post #94

sbf501 wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but really took off over the last few years with "step sibling" porn. Even one of the Mortys in R&M made a wish that "inc*st porn have more a mainstream appeal." My partner both winced at that and said to each other, "Did he just say what I think he said?" So maybe I'm just too old and traditional (despite being queer)?

It's ok to say incest. And fuck, too. It's a joke. However, if you've seen Dan Harmon's early work, it does make you wonder.

Post by groffee » Wed, Sep 14, 2022, 5:05 PM UTC

hammock wrote: post #97

hackernewds wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair these seem like naturally intuitive and simple ideas

It's actually patented by a porn site and YouTube pays them for the licensed use of it