Previous discussions: • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25167928 (21 November 2020, 82 comments) • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22681270 (25 March 2020, 91 comments) —⁂— > No class names, no frameworks, just semantic HTML and you're done. The trouble with this claim is that MVP.css abuses semantic HTML badly, using completely inappropriate elements all over the place (e.g. aside for cards, and b/strong/i…
I have to say I'm on the fence on this. On the one hand, in the first instance it seems a lot easier to remember the syntax. But thinking about it for longer, I realise that actually if I'm having to learn to put an inside a for a card, but an inside an becomes a callout, then perhaps it's not quite as intuitive as it seems, and if I have the mental overhead of remembering all that, perhaps I might be saving myself m…
MVP.css – Minimalist stylesheet for HTML elements
121–122 of 122 posts
Re: MVP.css – Minimalist stylesheet for HTML elements
#122Previous discussions: • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25167928 (21 November 2020, 82 comments) • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22681270 (25 March 2020, 91 comments) —⁂— > No class names, no frameworks, just semantic HTML and you're done. The trouble with this claim is that MVP.css abuses semantic HTML badly, using completely inappropriate elements all over the place (e.g. aside for cards, and b/strong/i…
Hi, author of MVP.css here. For those interested in the discussions around this, please refer to: https://github.com/andybrewer/mvp/issues/26 https://github.com/andybrewer/mvp/issues/2 I would concede that the use of ‘a strong’, ‘section aside’, etc. does require some learning and the styling is perhaps unique, but I don’t think it’s invalid in any way. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/st...…
I see you pretend to use buttons using styles. https://www.buttoncheatsheet.com/ That is bad, and you should fix bad.