Live data from Hacker News

Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

text.npr.org

451–460 of 693 posts

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#451
post #62

This is a country in which people who share memes mocking the trans flag are arrested. At least they're being consistent. Although obviously I'd prefer neither being arrested in the first place.

The official reason that guy got arrested was for "a tweet causing anxiety"

Great. But that law causes me anxiety. Can we arrest the people who passed it?

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

I agree that we should also strip the Kardashians of their legal authority over the nation as a whole

You have a point. OP probably doesn’t think twice about letting pop culture exert its authority but balks at a culture that seems from another age. A little more perspective is needed here.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#453
post #359

There are reasons Brits are "subjects", not "citizens". And why America declared No Truce with Kings. And why US presidents are not allowed to bow to kings. (Well, weren't until W did.)

Source? I thought it was Obama who bowed to kings.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#454
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They are being arrested for being rude about it. Which is substantially worse. Rudeness is so subjective and context sensitive that it really shouldn't form the basis for arrests

As an American, it is hard for me to properly grasp the fact that the UK almost seems closer to Saudi Arabia than the US in this regard. It does not seem like having a "fuck imperialism" sign should ever get you arrested in a country that is supposedly one of the closest allies of the US.

That's part of why the USA got created in the first place. Some people were discriminated against and/or locked in the Tower of London for inconveniencing the King or the establishment. Some of these people moved over and colonized the New World and achieved independence from the British Empire. That's also part of why the UK are your closest allies. Cultural heritage.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#455

The UK media (not just the BBC) continue to profess "amazement" at the speed and efficiency of the transitioning from a dead monarch to a living one. There's been much speaking in awed tones at the pace of the various proclamations, committee meetings, document signings, etc, as if this pace tells us why we should be impressed. Personally I've found it borderline sickening. If there was a curtain that could have slip…

Not that extreme for a constitutional monarchy bruh

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#456
Just wanted to remind people that the funeral of the Queen isn’t until next Monday. These people are getting arrested for shouting at royal proclamations and ceremonies of remembrance. The Police here seem to have a zero tolerance to any form of protest, and that is indeed concerning. For those who object to public sycophancy and pomp whilst ordinary people here have to use food banks to survive (me included this last month) I’d advise waiting until after the funeral to say something. Despite all the public displays of wealth and royal theatre the UK is in deep trouble and is very unstable. When that has happened in the past the authorities here overreact out of fear.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#458
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

I see this exact same comment did pretty well on Reddit too: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/xckw5v/comme... 1. Not all of the arrests have been made at a "funeral" 2. It wasn't a funeral 3. If you're going to have a very public precession, parading a body through the streets with all the obedients lapping it up, surely you have to have a level of tolerance for dissenting voices? I imagine the disrupt…

It’s a mourning procession. The purpose is to allow the public to mourn. Like a funeral procession without a body.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#459

The UK media (not just the BBC) continue to profess "amazement" at the speed and efficiency of the transitioning from a dead monarch to a living one. There's been much speaking in awed tones at the pace of the various proclamations, committee meetings, document signings, etc, as if this pace tells us why we should be impressed. Personally I've found it borderline sickening. If there was a curtain that could have slip…

Did you just notice you're in a monarchy? Have you never seen parliament open? You missed prorogation with the silly Black Rod nonsense? I'm not sure how you can characterize this as some creeky system that's just showing its face now lol it's built into so much of your government, multiple times a year, including one extremely high profile case (the prorogation) only a few months ago. Honestly, be grateful. I watch…

My Jr High history teacher in TX was apparently a royalist, said the revolutionaries were just a bunch of whiners.

The older I get, the more I agree.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#460
post #429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From your link: The Constitution of the United Kingdom or British constitution comprises the written and unwritten arrangements that establish the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as a political body. Unlike in most countries, no attempt has been made to codify such arrangements into a single document, thus it is known as an uncodified constitution. This enables the constitution to be easily chang…

Of course I agree that there is no written constitution, I said as much above. But there _is_ a constitution. Constitutions do not have to be written, unless you think otherwise?

Doesn’t that make it very difficult to determine what the constitution actually is, and leave a lot of room for different versions of the same constitutions?

It makes the constitution some abstract thing, rather than a very factual set of rules, which you want the constitution to be.

Post reply on HN