Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

news.ycombinator.com

211–220 of 270 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#211
post #19
post #12

Electromagnatic Compatibility Engineering, Henry Ott The Elements of Style, Strunk and White The Hardest (working) Man in Showbiz, Ron Jeremy

I'm intrigued by those choices and can't tell if you are making a subtle joke about life itself (building, writing, fucking?).

maybe they build set and write script for movies ?

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#212
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> why you recommend said books. > Sell them to me ok, i will try. 2 books I absolutely love and have read cover to cover several times, solved most of the 1000+ problems. 1. Inference - Rohatgi 2. Inference - Stapleton Why I recommend them ? The real answer is super long. But the short version is - there are thinkers & there are doers. Basically, the mathematical statistics world has these theory-building Bourbaki ty…

I like how you laid this out as a tension between two worldviews. I'm curious: as a seeming master of the "bag of tricks" worldview, do you feel like having fully absorbed so many "tricks" has given you a kind of empirical insight into things? In other words: have the tricks, when crashed against the real world over and over like you describe, oozed into something akin to a larger theoretical sense of things? Or do t…

i will unfortunately give you a half-assed response. Because the truth will take up a lot of time & space & is very inflammatory. So here's what I honestly believe - there are only isolated tricks. The ones who sit in judgement of us, like savants, and claim some sort of coalesced mastery of these tricks into some larger theoretical construct, are faking. They are good at faking, so we listen to them. They have better rhetoric, better optics. But beneath it all, it is a grab-bag of tricks. I worked with several professors. When trying to prove something they will start with their favorite trick. One guy was like - okay let me see if i can cauchy schwarz this. I'm like, why ? Why cauchy schwarz always? There are million inequality bounds. Why pester cs all the time ? He actually looked at me curiously then said I don't know I just have some favorite tricks it seems to work! Atleast he was honest. So that's the deal. If you probe deeply there are a few isolated tricks. They seem to work well. In reality we don't know why they work. But they do. Its like why do you not use spoon for spaghetti ? Why fork ? Ok you can cut lines into a spoon and call it a spork, but then you can't drink soup with the spork. So you reach for the spoon if you want to sip soup, use your fork for spaghetti. Don't try to design some universal theory of cookware. Just buy 1 spoon & 1 fork. That's basically all of mathematical statistics. Few tricks. They work. Why ? I mean who gives a fuck. Maybe bickel & doksum do but I personally don't.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#213

Hacker's Delight by Henry Warren. Don't get distracted by the name, it's about binary mathematics. Bit twiddling at its finest.

I second this choice. Be sure to get the second edition and to read the various fascicles for Knuth's Volume 4 of Art of Computer Programming. Volume 2 has some useful content as well.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#214
For the sciences that depend on higher maths, a Calculus book worth mention is "Elementary Calculus: An Infinitesimal Approach", by Jerome Keisler. One thing that makes learning Calculus harder than necessary is the clumsy epsilon and delta formalism, that became sort of the COBOL of Calculus teaching. This formalism is not the intuitive approach Newton and Leibniz used to develop Calculus, based on infinitesimals, that was shunned later because it took time until Abraham Robinson made it rigorous in the 1960s. The book by Keisler showcases nicely a way to improve higher math education, if academia had less inertia. The author made the entire book available for free online: https://people.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonstandard_analysis

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#216
post #94

I've been programming since I was 10, earned a C.S. degree in '96, and have been a successful generalist working as a sysadmin, programmer, network engineer, devops, open-source contributor, etc at everywhere from a small ISP in a college town where I was the only tech person to startups to companies as large as H.P. working on enterprise software. Really a bit of everything. I guess you'd call it dev-ops, but even i…

This is refreshingly old-school. Thank you!

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#217
post #161
post #120

The Selfish Gene should be read by everyone who studies biology or life science. Modern biological sciences are underlied by an understanding of evolution an genetics. I had heard variants of the phrase "change in allele frequency in a population over time," as a description of evolution many times starting in high school. But it wasn't until I read The Selfish Gene in college that I really understood what this meant…

I think a fantastic follow-up to The Selfish Gene is Daniel Dennett's From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds : https://www.amazon.com/Bacteria-Bach-Back-Evolution-Minds/dp... The author (a philosopher informed by scientific theories, writing on the subject for many decades) weaves together the grand story explaining biological evolution, evolution of minds, evolution of culture, and more (explaining h…

No post body was provided.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#218

My field of study (what I really like to think and learn about) isn't my field of work, but I like the question so I'll spill some thoughts. I spend a lot of time thinking about philosophical-ish stuff, so here are some books that have had the strongest residual effects (whether that's changing how I think, changing what I think about, changing my values, or simply getting the thought ball rolling faster): Ishmael (D…

The Planiverse: Computer contact with a two-dimensional world - by A.K. Dewdney

> A mind-bending, paradigm shifting visit with Yedred, a denizen of the 2 dimensional Universe. It is written so that the physics comes through very easily for those without science training. A university student discovers that this being Yendred is communicating with him through his computer. There begins a lively dialog as both the 2D Yendred and the 3D author struggle to explain and understand each others worlds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Planiverse

---

The Glass Bead Game - by Hermann Hesse

> The Glass Bead Game takes place at an unspecified date centuries in the future. Hesse suggested that he imagined the book's narrator writing around the start of the 25th century.

> The setting is a fictional province of central Europe called Castalia, which was reserved by political decision for the life of the mind.. Castalia is home to an austere order of intellectuals with a twofold mission: to run boarding schools, and to cultivate and play the Glass Bead Game, whose exact nature remains elusive and whose devotees occupy a special school in Castalia known as Waldzell.

> The rules of the game are only alluded to — they are so sophisticated that they are not easy to imagine. Playing the game well requires years of hard study of music, mathematics, and cultural history. The game is essentially an abstract synthesis of all arts and sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Glass_Bead_Game

---

The World as Will and Representation - by Arthur Schopenhauer

> The phrase "Tat Tvam Asi" ('thou art that'), one of the Mahāvākyas of the Upanishads, displayed on an Indian temple. Schopenhauer uses this Sanskrit phrase to express a foundational tenet of his ethics: 'the will is the in-itself of every appearance, and as such is itself free from the form of appearance, and thus from all multiplicity'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_as_Will_and_Represen...

---

The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies - by Thomas McEvilley

> Spanning thirty years of intensive research, this book proves what many scholars could not explain: that today’s Western world must be considered the product of both Greek and Indian thought — Western and Eastern philosophies.

> Thomas McEvilley explores how trade, imperialism, and migration currents allowed cultural philosophies to intermingle freely throughout India, Egypt, Greece, and the ancient Near East. This groundbreaking reference will stir relentless debate among philosophers, art historians, and students.

---

Temporary Autonomous Zone - by Hakim Bey

    1. Pirate Utopias
    2. Waiting for the Revolution
    3. The Psychotopology of Everyday Life
    4. The Net and the Web
    5. Gone to Croatan
    6. Music as an Organizational Principle
    7. The Will To Power as Disappearance
    8. Ratholes in the Babylon of Information
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Autonomous_Zone

---

Nature of Code - by Daniel Shiffman

https://natureofcode.com/

> How can we capture the unpredictable evolutionary and emergent properties of nature in software? How can understanding the mathematical principles behind our physical world help us to create digital worlds?

> This book focuses on a range of programming strategies and techniques behind computer simulations of natural systems, from elementary concepts in mathematics and physics to more advanced algorithms that enable sophisticated visual results.

> Readers will progress from building a basic physics engine to creating intelligent moving objects and complex systems, setting the foundation for further experiments in generative design. Subjects covered include forces, trigonometry, fractals, cellular automata, self-organization, and genetic algorithms.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#219
post #51

# Pure Mathematics / Geometry - Harshorne - Algebraic Geometry - Bott, Tu - Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology - Milnor, Stasheff - Characteristic Classes - Milnor - Morse Theory - Serre - Linear Representations of Finite Groups - Fulton - Intersection Theory

Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology might be one of the best math books ever written. I’ll add Milnor’s Topology from the Differential Viewpoint and/or Differential Topology by Guillemin and Pollack.

Another chime for Differential Topology. It's incredibly readable and accessible (given the subject).
Post reply on HN