Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
151–160 of 270 posts
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#152The best book on consulting is by the same guy: Secrets of Consulting.
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#153Intro to Smooth Manifolds, Lee -- sweeping intro to geometry with minimal prereqs, great at balancing the nitty gritty details with conveying intuition
A Course In Arithmetic, Serre -- classically terse and elegant intro to algebraic and analytic number theory. Goes from quadratic forms to Dirichlet's theorem to modular forms in a mere 100 pgs!
Princeton Lectures in Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi -- 4 books covering much of classical/modern analysis, they really shine in their discussion of applications
The large scale structure of space-time, Hawking & Ellis -- The most mathematically satisfying treatment of general relativity I've found. High points include proof of singularity theorems!
Spin Geometry, Lawson & Michelson -- Deep dive into the enigmatic "spin groups" and their applications in geometry. Also the only good (book) reference I could find on the index theorem
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm tripping on the first sentence of the blurb: > A type system is a syntactic method for enforcing levels of abstraction in programs. Why is it called a syntactic method? Because type errors are caught at compile time, by analyzing the source code?
My 2c: I think the point is that types themselves are just syntax. It's all bits at the lowest level, so there's really no such thing as a 'type' on a Turing Machine tape. It can be expressed syntactically on the tape, but that's the point.
This gets especially confusing when you bring in dispatch, where the types are now deciding what functions get called.
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#155Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South by Richard E. Nisbett & Dov Cohen
https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Honor-Psychology-Violence-Dir...
The authors weave together a basically airtight argument for their thesis, drawing on historical, sociological, and experimental evidence to describe and explain the phenomenon called "culture of honor". It's a short book and really worth reading to see how well an argument can be made.
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#156Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#157The Art of Electronics, Horowitz and Hill
This book's niche is in building the intuitive understanding that is often lacking after the typically highly mathematical treatment seen in 200-level circuit theory courses. It's a great transition from "ok, I can manipulate the equations for a circuit with one or two transistors" to being able to design complete, practical electronic devices. The book is also heavily used as a cookbook and reference by practicing electronics engineers as it contains a lot of expert wisdom particularly in the area of high-precision analog circuits (the authors' background is in physics lab instrumentation design).
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#158Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Maths: Rudin's Real and Complex analysis. Yes!! Rudin kills it, but you need a year or two to get through this gem. A course in university will go too fast for sure.
I often hear Rudin is too challenging to be an introduction to analysis. You need to be very comfortable with relevant proofs already. Then what's so good about it? I'm not doubting it's great because I do hear it lauded, but it's hard to imagine. It is just a collection of mathematical obscurities for super-nerds? I've been ever-so-slowly self teaching higher maths. Right now halfway through Hammond's book of proof…
> I'm not doubting it's great because I do hear it lauded, but it's hard to imagine.
Everyone has their own taste, even with math textbooks; there are plenty of acclaimed textbooks I hate (looking at you CRLS).
> I've been ever-so-slowly self teaching higher maths.
I happen to be in a Discord server for people self-studying math. It's a pretty cool place; if you are interested you can contact u/CheapViolin on Reddit.
Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?
#160I am going to repeat what I always say when these book threads come up: I love all the recommendations here but please say a word or two about why you recommend said books. Sell them to me, don't make me do the work. Dumb lists of titles are so uninteresting.