Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 270 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#51

# Pure Mathematics / Geometry - Harshorne - Algebraic Geometry - Bott, Tu - Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology - Milnor, Stasheff - Characteristic Classes - Milnor - Morse Theory - Serre - Linear Representations of Finite Groups - Fulton - Intersection Theory

Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology might be one of the best math books ever written.

I’ll add Milnor’s Topology from the Differential Viewpoint and/or Differential Topology by Guillemin and Pollack.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#53
post #24

Physics: Feynman's lectures on physics. Maths: Rudin's Real and Complex analysis. Software engineering: The Mythical Man-Month. Computer science: Knuth's TAOCP.

> Maths: Rudin's Real and Complex analysis. Yes!! Rudin kills it, but you need a year or two to get through this gem. A course in university will go too fast for sure.

I often hear Rudin is too challenging to be an introduction to analysis. You need to be very comfortable with relevant proofs already. Then what's so good about it? I'm not doubting it's great because I do hear it lauded, but it's hard to imagine. It is just a collection of mathematical obscurities for super-nerds?

I've been ever-so-slowly self teaching higher maths. Right now halfway through Hammond's book of proof and almost done with Polya 1.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#54
Computer science: Knuth's TAOCP. And Sipser's Introduction to the Theory of Computation. Programming: SICP, K&R, and Stroustrup. Siebel's Practical common lisp. Artificial intelligence: AI a modern approach. Signals and Systems: Oppenheim's book Probability and statistics: Probability Theory: The Logic of Science by Jaynes

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#55
post #6

Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach by John L. Hennessy the creator of MIPS and David Patterson the creator of Berkeley RISC (later SPARC) Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment by W. Richard Stevens

You could add MIPS, later RISC-V ; and RISC later ARM :)

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#56
post #22

For compiler theory, "Principles of Program Analysis" (by Nielson, Nielson, Hankin). It is so foundational to what we do at rev.ng, that we gift a physical copy of the book to every interviewee, even if they don't pass.

Hi, how does the book compares to the dragon book?

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#57
Types and programming languages, Benjamin Pierce: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/tapl/

Its contents is what I consider the meta game of programming. Understanding types seems to be a real boost to think about architecture, implementation, etc.

Re: Ask HN: Which books do you consider real gems in your field of work/study?

#59
I am not a professional game designer, but I really like "The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses". It teaches you to look at games (and all kinds of experiences) through different viewpoints like looking at the economy of the game or looking at the love and relationships in the game. Very interesting for thinking about the complex systems within modern games.
Post reply on HN