Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you’ve got that backwards. iTunes had a fraction of the features Winamp did.
It is amazing, I remember using out of the box winamp for decentralized video streaming circa ~2003?. This was years before YouTube was even founded
Winamp 5.9
111–120 of 132 posts
Re: Winamp 5.9
#112I'll just leave this here to stoke the flames of nostalgia: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Winamp2.PNG
Re: Winamp 5.9
#113For MacOS - still has WinAmp skin support. https://re-amp.ru/
Re: Winamp 5.9
#114Foobar is the "new" Winamp, it has been for 15years+ https://www.foobar2000.org/
I've used both Foobar and MusicBee (on Windows) and personally I prefer MusicBee's interface. It works well with my library of 21k files - not sure how it performs with libraries much larger. https://getmusicbee.com/
Re: Winamp 5.9
#115Yes, it's disappointing.
Re: Winamp 5.9
#116Re: Winamp 5.9
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is that really an ahem apples to apples comparison? Depending on when we're talking, iTunes had many more built in features than Winamp...
Winamp may be an unfair comparison. I'm not overly familiar with that period's iTunes, but I remember when I bought my first iPod, a 4th gen click wheel (don't remember the year, but it was already an "older model" at the time) I was using Amarok on Linux on an AMD Thunderbird with 256 MB of RAM. That thing would fly. And it did more than Winamp: it had an actual DB-backed music library, iPod interface, etc. Yet, a f…
Re: Winamp 5.9
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you’ve got that backwards. iTunes had a fraction of the features Winamp did.
On the music player side yes, but it had a lot of features/bloat like the music store and iPod synchronization.
This is a hilarious statement to read, cause that's probably what 80% of people were using iTunes exclusively for and relegating their music listening to their iPod/iPhone, especially in the later part of the 00s.
Re: Winamp 5.9
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use Teams daily on a MacBook Pro with 32 GB RAM. If I walk away from the laptop and Teams detects idleness, it starts consuming 100% CPU and the fan turns on. Returning to the computer, everything is dog slow for several minutes. Drives me crazy. The other thing that drives me crazy about Teams is there still is no “temporary mute” for channels. I can’t mute a channel for say, an hour. I have to suffer through noti…
Whatsapp drives me crazy with this too. You can only mute for 8 hours, 1 week, or forever. No other options. Just let me choose how long to mute for, a billion dollar corporation could surely afford that. And a single 'custom' button wouldn't ruin the 'clean UI' or whatever they're trying to maintain. This problem is an annoyance. The slowness of Teams, however, is unforgivable. There's no excuse why a chat app from…
Now 1GB is not enough, not even with 2GB, that's borderline usable with XFCE4 and Alpine Linux and ZRAM (my Celeron notebook setup). You can browse stuff fine with UBo and Chromium with privacy and performance tweaks (git://bitreich.org/privacy-haters), but if you launch heavy stuff (Glibc gcompat stuff such as Teams) will keeping a bunch of tabs open, the speed grinds down a lot.
Re: Winamp 5.9
#120Older software like this runs extremely fast on my newest hardware. Switching to lightweight native apps is sometimes more of a speedup than dropping >$3000 on new a workstation class laptop. Of course, you usually need the latest hardware to eat through modern workloads. But aside from that, I sometimes forget clearing out software bloat is a much more effective way to gain performance, productivity and improvements…